Is sized typing for Coq practical?. (24th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: CHAN, JONATHAN; LI, YUFENG; BOWMAN, WILLIAM J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of functional programming. Volume 33(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-01-24
• Subjects: Functional programming (Computer science) -- Periodicals
• DOI: 10.1017/S0956796822000120
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-7968

Abstract

Abstract: Contemporary proof assistants such as Coq require that recursive functions be terminating and corecursive functions be productive to maintain logical consistency of their type theories, and some ensure these properties using syntactic checks. However, being syntactic, they are inherently delicate and restrictive, preventing users from easily writing obviously terminating or productive functions at their whim. Meanwhile, there exist many sized type theories that perform type-based termination and productivity checking, including theories based on the Calculus of (Co)Inductive Constructions (CIC), the core calculus underlying Coq. These theories are more robust and compositional in comparison. So why haven't they been adapted to Coq? In this paper, we venture to answer this question with CIC $\widehat{\ast}$, a sized type theory based on CIC. It extends past work on sized types in CIC with additional Coq features such as global and local definitions. We also present a corresponding size inference algorithm and implement it within Coq's kernel; for maximal backward compatibility with existing Coq developments, it requires no additional annotations from the user. In our evaluation of the implementation, we find a severe performance degradation when compiling parts of the Coq standard library, inherent to the algorithm itself. We conclude that if we wish to maintain backward compatibility, using size inference as a replacement for syntactic checking is impractical in terms of performance.