Generative processing and emotional false memories: a generation "cost" for negative false memory formation but only after delay. Issue 7 (3rd October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Knott, Lauren; Wilkinson, Samantha; Hellenthal, Maria; Shah, Datin; Howe, Mark L.
• Is Part Of: Cognition and emotion. Volume 36:Issue 7(2022)
• Page Start: 1448
• Page End: 1457
• Publication Date: 2022-10-03
• Subjects: DRM paradigm -- false memories -- emotion -- generation effect; Cognition -- Periodicals; Emotions and cognition -- Periodicals; 155.413
• DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2128063
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9931

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Previous research shows that manipulations (e.g. levels-of-processing) that facilitate true memory often increase susceptibility to false memory. An exception is the generation effect. Using the Deese/Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm, Soraci et al. found that generating rather than reading list items led to an increase in true but not false memories. They argued that generation led to enhanced item-distinctiveness that drove down false memory production. In the current study, we investigated the effects of generative processing on valenced stimuli and after a delayed retention interval to examine factors that may lead to a generation effect that increases false memories. At the immediate test, false recognition rates for both negative and neutral valanced critical lures were similar across read and generate conditions. However, after a one-week delay, we saw a valence differentiation, with a generation effect for false recognition but only for negative stimuli. The roles of item-specific and relational processing during encoding and their interaction with long-term retention are discussed.