Examining circuity of urban transit networks from an equity perspective. (February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dixit, Malvika; Chowdhury, Subeh; Cats, Oded; Brands, Ties; van Oort, Niels; Hoogendoorn, Serge
• Is Part Of: Journal of transport geography. Volume 91(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-02
• Subjects: Circuity -- Equity -- Low-income -- Transit networks -- Network efficiency -- Fare policy; Transportation -- Periodicals; Telecommunication -- Periodicals; Transport -- Périodiques; Télécommunications -- Périodiques; Telecommunication; Transportation; Periodicals; 388
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102980
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0966-6923

Abstract

Abstract: Circuity of transit networks, defined as the ratio of network to Euclidean distance traveled from origin to destination stop, has been known to influence travel behavior. In addition to the longer time spent in travel, for networks where fare is based on distance traveled, higher circuity also means higher fare for the same Euclidean distance. This makes circuity relevant from an equity perspective. Using a case study of the urban transit network of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, this study explores the role of transit circuity on the disparity in distance traveled by travelers' income profile and its implications on travel times and costs for networks with distance-based fares. The analysis is based on travel patterns from smart card data for bus, tram, and metro modes, combined with neighborhood level income data. Results reveal that in Amsterdam, the higher the share of high income people living in proximity to a transit stop, the lower the circuity of journeys from the stop, when controlled for the Euclidean distance covered and spatial auto-correlation. The uneven distribution of circuity exacerbates the disparity in distance traveled, and hence fare paid between the income groups. However, the travel time per Euclidean distance favors the low income group, possibly due to the circuitous routes serving these areas being compensated by higher travel speeds. This study highlights the role of transit network design in determining its equity outcomes and emphasizes the importance of considering equity during route and fare planning. The process followed can be adapted to examine equity for other urban networks. Highlights: Examined contribution of circuity to equity in urban transit networks. High income areas in Amsterdam had less circuitous transit journeys. Uneven distribution of circuity exacerbated the disparity in fare paid. Considering equity during transit network design can reduce inequity of fare paid.