Responses of greenhouse gas emissions to residue returning in China's croplands and influential factors: A meta-analysis. (1st July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Responses of greenhouse gas emissions to residue returning in China's croplands and influential factors: A meta-analysis. (1st July 2021)
- Main Title:
- Responses of greenhouse gas emissions to residue returning in China's croplands and influential factors: A meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Wang, Xu-Dong
He, Cong
Cheng, Hang-Yuan
Liu, Bing-Yang
Li, Shuai-Shuai
Wang, Qi
Liu, Yang
Zhao, Xin
Zhang, Hai-Lin - Abstract:
- Abstract: Climate change is a global issue threatening agricultural production and human survival. However, agriculture sector is a major source of global greenhouse gases (GHGs), especially CH4 and N2 O. Crop residue returning (RR) is an efficient practice to sequestrate soil carbon and increase crop yields. However, the efficiency of RR to mitigate climate change and maintain food security will be affected by the response of GHG emissions at both per area-scale and per yield-scale. Therefore, a national meta-analysis was conducted using 309 comparisons from 44 publications to assess the responses of GHG emissions to RR in China's croplands. The results indicated that little response of GWP to RR was observed with conditions under lower nitrogen fertilizer input rates (0–120 kg ha −1 ), mulch retention, returning one time in double cropping systems, returning with half residue, weakly acidic soil (pH 5.5–6.5), initial SOC contents >20 g kg −1, or mean annual precipitation <1000 mm. In order to mitigate climate change and sustain food security, RR combined with paddy-upland rotation, nitrogen fertilizer input rates of 240–360 kg ha −1, and neutral soil (pH 6.5–7.5) could decrease GWP at per unit of crop yield, which ultimately leads to a lower effect on GHGI and a higher crop production efficiency. In-depth studies should be conducted in the future to explore the interactions between various factors influencing GHG emissions under RR conditions. Overall, optimizing theAbstract: Climate change is a global issue threatening agricultural production and human survival. However, agriculture sector is a major source of global greenhouse gases (GHGs), especially CH4 and N2 O. Crop residue returning (RR) is an efficient practice to sequestrate soil carbon and increase crop yields. However, the efficiency of RR to mitigate climate change and maintain food security will be affected by the response of GHG emissions at both per area-scale and per yield-scale. Therefore, a national meta-analysis was conducted using 309 comparisons from 44 publications to assess the responses of GHG emissions to RR in China's croplands. The results indicated that little response of GWP to RR was observed with conditions under lower nitrogen fertilizer input rates (0–120 kg ha −1 ), mulch retention, returning one time in double cropping systems, returning with half residue, weakly acidic soil (pH 5.5–6.5), initial SOC contents >20 g kg −1, or mean annual precipitation <1000 mm. In order to mitigate climate change and sustain food security, RR combined with paddy-upland rotation, nitrogen fertilizer input rates of 240–360 kg ha −1, and neutral soil (pH 6.5–7.5) could decrease GWP at per unit of crop yield, which ultimately leads to a lower effect on GHGI and a higher crop production efficiency. In-depth studies should be conducted in the future to explore the interactions between various factors influencing GHG emissions under RR conditions. Overall, optimizing the interactions with management and site-specific conditions, potential for regulating GHGs emissions of RR can be enhanced. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Responses of GHG emissions to RR were assessed using a national meta-analysis. Adjusted management practices could reduce GWP increasing amplitude and increase crop production efficiency. RR could sequestrate soil carbon, regulate GHGs emissions, and enhance crop production. RR offers the potentials to achieve main goals of climate-smart agriculture. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of environmental management. Volume 289(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of environmental management
- Issue:
- Volume 289(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 289, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 289
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0289-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07-01
- Subjects:
- Climate change mitigation -- Yield-scale emission -- Global warming potential -- Greenhouse gases intensity -- Meta-analysis
Environmental policy -- Periodicals
Environmental management -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
363.705 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014797 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112486 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4797
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4979.383000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25118.xml