Are Banks Responsible for Animal Welfare and Climate Disruption? A Critical Review of Australian Banks' Due Diligence Policies for Agribusiness Lending. Issue 3 (26th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parker, Christine; Sheedy-Reinhard, Lucinda
• Is Part Of: Transnational environmental law. Volume 11:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 603
• Page End: 628
• Publication Date: 2022-11-26
• Subjects: Sustainable finance -- Agriculture -- Environmental social governance -- Responsible investment -- Factory farming -- Responsible banking; Environmental law, International -- Periodicals; 344.046
• DOI: 10.1017/S204710252200022X
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-1025

Abstract

Abstract: This article argues that banks should adopt animal welfare policies in the light of the growing acceptance of the need for 'responsible banking', which incorporates environmental, social, and governance analysis into credit risk and due diligence processes. The responsibility of banks for animal welfare is underscored by the drive towards greater investment in animal agribusiness, and the vicious cycle through which animal agribusiness can both contribute to, and be impacted by, climate disruption. The article evaluates, through a desktop review, how leading Australian retail banks and agribusiness lenders are addressing animal welfare and climate disruption in animal agribusiness lending. We find that although most banks have made a commitment to animal welfare and climate policies, these often amount to little more than greenwashing. We call for an ecosystem of industry, regulatory, and civil society action to address this danger.