Adjuvant ovarian suppression for premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A network meta-analysis. Issue 33 (20th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jiang, Mengjie; Chen, Wuzhen; Hu, Yujie; Chen, Chao; Li, Huafeng
• Editors: Mojumdar., Kamalika
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 100:Issue 33(2021)
• Page Start: e26949
• Publication Date: 2021-08-20
• Subjects: adjuvant endocrine therapy -- GnRHα ovarian function suppression -- network meta-analysis -- premenopausal breast cancer; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026949
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract: Background: Ovarian function suppressor (OFS) plus either tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitor (AI) could improve the survival outcome for premenopausal hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. However, the optimal OFS-based regimen and medication duration remain uncertain. This article aims to systematically evaluate the OFS-based adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal breast cancer. Methods: We searched several public databases from January 1980 to November 2020. A random model was adopted in this meta-analysis. We used the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the statistical analysis of efficacy. The primary outcome measures included overall survival and disease-free survival. Results: A total of 32 articles with 37, 224 cases were included in this network meta-analysis. OFS+TAM improved 5-year disease-free survival (HR –0.09, 95% CI –0.16 to –0.01) and 5-year overall survival (HR –0.18, 95% CI –0.33 to –0.03) compared with TAM monotherapy. For OFS+AI, although the 5-year disease-free survival was improved (HR –0.18, 95% CI –0.29 to –0.08), the 5-year overall survival was not improved (HR –0.13, 95% CI –0.43 to 0.18). In subgroup analysis, both OFS+AI and OFS+TAM showed a protective effect in stage I–III patients compared with stage I–II patients. For the course of therapy, OFS+TAM for 2-years could achieve clinical benefit and the best course of therapy of OFS+AI still waits for further study. Conclusions: OFS+TAM might be a better option than OFS+AI for premenopausal intensive adjuvant endocrine therapy. Stage III patients are more suitable for the OFS-based therapy. For the medication duration, the 2-years course of OFS+TAM could be effective. This analysis provides helpful information for selecting therapeutic regimen in intensive adjuvant endocrine therapy and identifying the target population.