Higher Incidence but Similar Outcomes from Bloodstream Infections in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Case-Controlled Analysis. (October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Higher Incidence but Similar Outcomes from Bloodstream Infections in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Case-Controlled Analysis. (October 2020)
- Main Title:
- Higher Incidence but Similar Outcomes from Bloodstream Infections in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Case-Controlled Analysis
- Authors:
- Bryce, A.N.
Phillips, R.
Skittrall, J.P.
Chakera, A.J.
McLoughlin, J.K.
Sargent, C.S. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aims: People with type 2 diabetes mellitus are more susceptible to infections. This study aimed to compare the microbiology, incidence and clinical outcome of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in people with type 2 diabetes and matched controls amongst a cohort of hospital inpatients in the United Kingdom. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all positive blood cultures obtained over a one-year period, identifying inpatients with type 2 diabetes and BSIs (n = 151). Matched controls were collated from the same cohort. Admission data were obtained from clinical coding. Patient outcomes were analysed in terms of 90-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) and admission rate to high or intensive dependency units (HDU/ICU). Microbial culture and clinical source of infection were compared between groups. Results: Patients with type 2 diabetes comprised 10.6% of admissions but 21.1% (n = 151) of analysed BSIs (OR: 2.27, p < .001). Similar 90-day mortality rates were seen between people with type 2 diabetes (D) and controls (C) (D: 23/151, C: 28/151, p = .54). Mean LOS was also similar (D: 19.8 days, C: 21.1 days p = .62). In both groups, Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated organism (D: 64/173, C: 55/171) and the urinary tract the most common identified primary site of BSI (D: 47/151, C: 45/151). Conclusions: Whilst inpatients with type 2 diabetes have increased odds of experiencing BSIs, our single-centre study suggests a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes doesAbstract: Aims: People with type 2 diabetes mellitus are more susceptible to infections. This study aimed to compare the microbiology, incidence and clinical outcome of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in people with type 2 diabetes and matched controls amongst a cohort of hospital inpatients in the United Kingdom. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all positive blood cultures obtained over a one-year period, identifying inpatients with type 2 diabetes and BSIs (n = 151). Matched controls were collated from the same cohort. Admission data were obtained from clinical coding. Patient outcomes were analysed in terms of 90-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) and admission rate to high or intensive dependency units (HDU/ICU). Microbial culture and clinical source of infection were compared between groups. Results: Patients with type 2 diabetes comprised 10.6% of admissions but 21.1% (n = 151) of analysed BSIs (OR: 2.27, p < .001). Similar 90-day mortality rates were seen between people with type 2 diabetes (D) and controls (C) (D: 23/151, C: 28/151, p = .54). Mean LOS was also similar (D: 19.8 days, C: 21.1 days p = .62). In both groups, Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated organism (D: 64/173, C: 55/171) and the urinary tract the most common identified primary site of BSI (D: 47/151, C: 45/151). Conclusions: Whilst inpatients with type 2 diabetes have increased odds of experiencing BSIs, our single-centre study suggests a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes does not necessarily confer a worse outcome. Highlights: Inpatients with type 2 diabetes are at increased odds of bloodstream infections However, they do not experience a worse prognosis from these infections The urinary tract was the most common source and E. coli the most cultured organism Therefore, focus on early prevention and treatment is paramount … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infection in practice. Volume 7/8(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical infection in practice
- Issue:
- Volume 7/8(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 7/8, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 7/8
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-NaN-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10
- Subjects:
- Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
Communicable Diseases
Infections
Communicable diseases
Infection
Electronic journals
Periodical
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/clinical-infection-in-practice ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clinpr.2020.100030 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2590-1702
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25113.xml