Study on the Difference of Moisture-keeping Performance between Fresh-keeping Packaging and Conventional Packaging. Issue 1 (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Ying; Zhan, Jianbo; Wang, Hao; Zheng, Han; Li, Geng; Yu, Zhenhua; Li, Xiangzhen; Xie, Jiao; Wang, Xu; Jiao, Jun; Yu, Tingting; Yu, Yao; Yue, Baoshan
• Is Part Of: IOP conference series. Volume 461:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: Earth sciences -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Congresses; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; 550.5
• DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/461/1/012098
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-1307

Abstract

Abstract: Packaging materials and packaging design have an important influence on the quality of cigarettes in the consumption process of unpacked cigarette packaging. In this paper, the effects of freshness-keeping packaging on moisture-keeping capacity, sensory quality, macula cigarette risk control after opening cigarette packaging were studied. The results showed: (1) After the opening of cigarette packages, the moisture content of cigarettes could be effectively maintained in fresh-keeping packages, while the moisture content of cigarettes in conventional packages would vary in a large range with time and environment (except equilibrium conditions). (2) In a high temperature test environment of 35 °C, the moisture content variation range of samples was as follows, paper-aluminium-plastic composite viscose hard freshness-keeping packaging > aluminium-plastic thermal package hard fresh-keeping packaging > paper-aluminium-plastic composite viscose soft freshness-keeping packaging. Differences in the type, material and process of freshness-keeping packaging may lead to differences in moisture retention performance, but the differences are not obvious.