Cultural evolution and prehistoric demography. (18th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Strassberg, Sarah Saxton; Creanza, Nicole
• Is Part Of: Philosophical transactions. Volume 376:Number 1816(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-01-18
• Subjects: cultural evolution -- toolkit complexity -- cultural repertoire -- prehistoric demography -- population size; Biology -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals; 570
• DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0713
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-8436

Abstract

Abstract : One prominent feature of human culture is that different populations have different tools, technologies and cultural artefacts, and these unique toolkits can also differ in size and complexity. Over the past few decades, researchers in the fields of prehistoric demography and cultural evolution have addressed a number of questions regarding variation in toolkit size and complexity across prehistoric and modern populations. Several factors have been proposed as possible explanations for this variation: in particular, the mobility of a population, the resources it uses, the volatility of its environment and the number of individuals in the population. Using a variety of methods, including empirical and ethnographic research, computational models and laboratory-based experiments, researchers have found disparate results regarding each hypothesis. These discordant findings have led to debate over the factors that most significantly influence toolkit size and composition. For instance, several computational, empirical and laboratory studies of food-producing populations have found a positive correlation between the number of individuals in a population and toolkit size, whereas similar studies of hunter–gatherer populations have found little evidence of such a link. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive review of the literature in this field of study and propose corollaries and interdisciplinary approaches with the goal of reconciling dissimilar findings into a more comprehensive view of cultural toolkit variation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Cross-disciplinary approaches to prehistoric demography'.