Form–function relationships in dragonfly mandibles under an evolutionary perspective. Issue 128 (31st March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Blanke, Alexander; Schmitz, Helmut; Patera, Alessandra; Dutel, Hugo; Fagan, Michael J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Royal Society interface. Volume 14:Issue 128(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-03-31
• Subjects: insect -- finite element analysis -- geometric morphometrics -- functional morphology -- phylogeny; Physical sciences -- Research -- Periodicals; Life sciences -- Research -- Periodicals; Interdisciplinary research -- Periodicals; 570.5
• DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.1038
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1742-5689

Abstract

Abstract : Functional requirements may constrain phenotypic diversification or foster it. For insect mouthparts, the quantification of the relationship between shape and function in an evolutionary framework remained largely unexplored. Here, the question of a functional influence on phenotypic diversification for dragonfly mandibles is assessed with a large-scale biomechanical analysis covering nearly all anisopteran families, using finite element analysis in combination with geometric morphometrics. A constraining effect of phylogeny could be found for shape, the mandibular mechanical advantage (MA), and certain mechanical joint parameters, while stresses and strains, the majority of joint parameters and size are influenced by shared ancestry. Furthermore, joint mechanics are correlated with neither strain nor mandibular MA and size effects have virtually play no role for shape or mechanical variation. The presence of mandibular strengthening ridges shows no phylogenetic signal except for one ridge peculiar to Libelluloidea, and ridge presence is also not correlated with each other. The results suggest that functional traits are more variable at this taxonomic level and that they are not influenced by shared ancestry. At the same time, the results contradict the widespread idea that mandibular morphology mainly reflects functional demands at least at this taxonomic level. The varying functional factors rather lead to the same mandibular performance as expressed by the MA, which suggests a many-to-one mapping of the investigated parameters onto the same narrow mandibular performance space.