An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values. Issue 3 (November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Colquhoun, David
• Is Part Of: Royal Society open science. Volume 1:Issue 3(2014)
• Publication Date: 2014-11
• Subjects: significance tests -- reproducibility -- statistics -- false discovery rate; Science -- Periodicals; 500
• DOI: 10.1098/rsos.140216
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2054-5703

Abstract

Abstract : If you use p =0.05 to suggest that you have made a discovery, you will be wrong at least 30% of the time. If, as is often the case, experiments are underpowered, you will be wrong most of the time. This conclusion is demonstrated from several points of view. First, tree diagrams which show the close analogy with the screening test problem. Similar conclusions are drawn by repeated simulations of t -tests. These mimic what is done in real life, which makes the results more persuasive. The simulation method is used also to evaluate the extent to which effect sizes are over-estimated, especially in underpowered experiments. A script is supplied to allow the reader to do simulations themselves, with numbers appropriate for their own work. It is concluded that if you wish to keep your false discovery rate below 5%, you need to use a three-sigma rule, or to insist on p ≤0.001. And never use the word 'significant'.