Close-range laser scanning in forests: towards physically based semantics across scales. Issue 2 (6th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Morsdorf, F.; Kükenbrink, D.; Schneider, F. D.; Abegg, M.; Schaepman, M. E.
• Is Part Of: Interface focus. Volume 8:Issue 2(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-04-06
• Subjects: laser scanning -- ultra-light aerial vehicle -- forests -- radiative transfer modelling -- ray tracing -- leaf area index; Physical sciences -- Periodicals; Life sciences -- Periodicals; 500
• DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0046
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2042-8898

Abstract

Abstract : Laser scanning with its unique measurement concept holds the potential to revolutionize the way we assess and quantify three-dimensional vegetation structure. Modern laser systems used at close range, be it on terrestrial, mobile or unmanned aerial platforms, provide dense and accurate three-dimensional data whose information just waits to be harvested. However, the transformation of such data to information is not as straightforward as for airborne and space-borne approaches, where typically empirical models are built using ground truth of target variables. Simpler variables, such as diameter at breast height, can be readily derived and validated. More complex variables, e.g. leaf area index, need a thorough understanding and consideration of the physical particularities of the measurement process and semantic labelling of the point cloud. Quantified structural models provide a framework for such labelling by deriving stem and branch architecture, a basis for many of the more complex structural variables. The physical information of the laser scanning process is still underused and we show how it could play a vital role in conjunction with three-dimensional radiative transfer models to shape the information retrieval methods of the future. Using such a combined forward and physically based approach will make methods robust and transferable. In addition, it avoids replacing observer bias from field inventories with instrument bias from different laser instruments. Still, an intensive dialogue with the users of the derived information is mandatory to potentially re-design structural concepts and variables so that they profit most of the rich data that close-range laser scanning provides.