What Cut-Point in Gait Speed Best Discriminates Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mobility Complaints From Those Without? A Pooled Analysis From the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium. (24th June 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- What Cut-Point in Gait Speed Best Discriminates Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mobility Complaints From Those Without? A Pooled Analysis From the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium. (24th June 2021)
- Main Title:
- What Cut-Point in Gait Speed Best Discriminates Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mobility Complaints From Those Without? A Pooled Analysis From the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium
- Authors:
- Cawthon, Peggy M
Patel, Sheena M
Kritchevsky, Stephen B
Newman, Anne B
Santanasto, Adam
Kiel, Douglas P
Travison, Thomas G
Lane, Nancy
Cummings, Steven R
Orwoll, Eric S
Duchowny, Kate A
Kwok, Timothy
Hirani, Vasant
Schousboe, John
Karlsson, Magnus K
Mellström, Dan
Ohlsson, Claes
Ljunggren, Östen
Xue, Qian-Li
Shardell, Michelle
Jordan, Joanne M
Pencina, Karol M
Fielding, Roger A
Magaziner, Jay
Correa-de-Araujo, Rosaly
Bhasin, Shalender
Manini, Todd M - Editors:
- Le Couteur, David
- Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Cut-points to define slow walking speed have largely been derived from expert opinion. Methods: Study participants (13 589 men and 5043 women aged ≥65years) had walking speed (m/s) measured over 4–6 m (mean ± SD : 1.20 ± 0.27 m/s in men and 0.94 ± 0.24 m/s in women.) Mobility limitation was defined as any self-reported difficulty with walking approximately 1/4 mile (prevalence: 12.6% men, 26.4% women). Sex-stratified classification and regression tree (CART) models with 10-fold cross-validation identified walking speed cut-points that optimally discriminated those who reported mobility limitation from those who did not. Results: Among 5043 women, CART analysis identified 2 cut-points, classifying 4144 (82.2%) with walking speed ≥0.75 m/s, which we labeled as "fast"; 478 (9.5%) as "intermediate" (walking speed ≥0.62 m/s but <0.75 m/s); and 421 (8.3%) as "slow" (walking speed <0.62 m/s). Among 13 589 men, CART analysis identified 3 cut-points, classifying 10 001 (73.6%) with walking speed ≥1.00 m/s ("very fast"); 2901 (21.3%) as "fast" (walking speed ≥0.74 m/s but <1.00 m/s); 497 (3.7%) as "intermediate" (walking speed ≥0.57 m/s but <0.74 m/s); and 190 (1.4%) as "slow" (walking speed <0.57 m/s). Prevalence of self-reported mobility limitation was lowest in the "fast" or "very fast" (11% for men and 19% for women) and highest in the "slow" (60.5% in men and 71.0% in women). Rounding the 2 slower cut-points to 0.60 m/s and 0.75 m/s reclassified very fewAbstract: Background: Cut-points to define slow walking speed have largely been derived from expert opinion. Methods: Study participants (13 589 men and 5043 women aged ≥65years) had walking speed (m/s) measured over 4–6 m (mean ± SD : 1.20 ± 0.27 m/s in men and 0.94 ± 0.24 m/s in women.) Mobility limitation was defined as any self-reported difficulty with walking approximately 1/4 mile (prevalence: 12.6% men, 26.4% women). Sex-stratified classification and regression tree (CART) models with 10-fold cross-validation identified walking speed cut-points that optimally discriminated those who reported mobility limitation from those who did not. Results: Among 5043 women, CART analysis identified 2 cut-points, classifying 4144 (82.2%) with walking speed ≥0.75 m/s, which we labeled as "fast"; 478 (9.5%) as "intermediate" (walking speed ≥0.62 m/s but <0.75 m/s); and 421 (8.3%) as "slow" (walking speed <0.62 m/s). Among 13 589 men, CART analysis identified 3 cut-points, classifying 10 001 (73.6%) with walking speed ≥1.00 m/s ("very fast"); 2901 (21.3%) as "fast" (walking speed ≥0.74 m/s but <1.00 m/s); 497 (3.7%) as "intermediate" (walking speed ≥0.57 m/s but <0.74 m/s); and 190 (1.4%) as "slow" (walking speed <0.57 m/s). Prevalence of self-reported mobility limitation was lowest in the "fast" or "very fast" (11% for men and 19% for women) and highest in the "slow" (60.5% in men and 71.0% in women). Rounding the 2 slower cut-points to 0.60 m/s and 0.75 m/s reclassified very few participants. Conclusions: Cut-points in walking speed of approximately 0.60 m/s and 0.75 m/s discriminate those with self-reported mobility limitation from those without. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journals of gerontology. Volume 76:Number 10(2021)
- Journal:
- Journals of gerontology
- Issue:
- Volume 76:Number 10(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 76, Issue 10 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 76
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0076-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- e321
- Page End:
- e327
- Publication Date:
- 2021-06-24
- Subjects:
- Classification and regression trees -- Gait speed -- Mobility limitation
Geriatrics -- Periodicals
Gerontology -- Periodicals
618.97 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/ ↗
http://biomed.gerontologyjournals.org/ ↗
http://biomedgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.proquest.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/gerona/glab183 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1079-5006
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4995.099000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25051.xml