Refractory and Resistant Cytomegalovirus After Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in the Letermovir Primary Prophylaxis Era. (8th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sassine, Joseph; Khawaja, Fareed; Shigle, Terri Lynn; Handy, Victoria; Foolad, Farnaz; Aitken, Samuel L; Jiang, Ying; Champlin, Richard; Shpall, Elizabeth; Rezvani, Katy; Ariza-Heredia, Ella J; Chemaly, Roy F
• Is Part Of: Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 73:Number 8(2021)
• Page Start: 1346
• Page End: 1354
• Publication Date: 2021-04-08
• Subjects: cytomegalovirus -- hematopoietic cell transplant -- letermovir -- refractory and resistant cytomegalovirus -- mortality; Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; 616.905
• DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab298
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1058-4838

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is one of the most common infectious complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and may result in significant morbidity and mortality. Primary prophylaxis with letermovir demonstrated a reduction in clinically significant CMV infections (CS-CMVi) in clinical trials of CMV-seropositive HCT recipients. This study aims at exploring the effect of primary letermovir prophylaxis in this population on the incidence and outcomes of refractory or resistant CMV infections. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 537 consecutive CMV-seropositive allogeneic HCT recipients cared for between March 2016 and October 2018. Baseline demographics, HCT characteristics, CMV infections, treatment, and mortality data were collected from the electronic medical record. CMV outcomes were defined according to the recently standardized definitions for clinical trials. Characteristics and outcomes were assessed according to receipt of primary letermovir prophylaxis. Results: Of 537 patients identified, 123 received letermovir for primary prophylaxis during the first 100 days after HCT; 414 did not. In a multivariate analysis, primary prophylaxis with letermovir was associated with reductions in CS-CMVi (hazard ratio [HR] 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16–0.41), CMV end-organ disease (HR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10–0.52), refractory or resistant CMV infection (HR 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04–0.52), and nonrelapse mortality at week 48 (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32–0.93). There was neither resistant CMV nor CMV-related mortality in the primary letermovir prophylaxis group. Conclusions: Primary letermovir prophylaxis effectively prevents refractory or resistant CMV infections and decreases nonrelapse mortality at week 48, as well as CS-CMVi and CMV disease after allogeneic HCT. Abstract : Primary letermovir prophylaxis effectively prevents refractory or resistant CMV infections in CMV-seropositive allogeneic HCT recipients and is associated with a lower nonrelapse mortality at 48 weeks after allogeneic HCT.