Detecting Heterogeneity of Intervention Effects Using Analysis and Meta-analysis of Differences in Variance Between Trial Arms. Issue 6 (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mills, Harriet L.; Higgins, Julian P.T.; Morris, Richard W.; Kessler, David; Heron, Jon; Wiles, Nicola; Davey Smith, George; Tilling, Kate
• Is Part Of: Epidemiology. Volume 32:Issue 6(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Effect modification -- Heterogeneity -- Meta-analyses -- Randomized controlled trials -- Subgroups -- Subgroup analysis -- Variance; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.405
• DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001401
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1044-3983

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with continuous outcomes usually only examine mean differences in response between trial arms. If the intervention has heterogeneous effects, then outcome variances will also differ between arms. Power of an individual trial to assess heterogeneity is lower than the power to detect the same size of main effect. Methods: We describe several methods for assessing differences in variance in trial arms and apply them to a single trial with individual patient data and to meta-analyses using summary data. Where individual data are available, we use regression-based methods to examine the effects of covariates on variation. We present an additional method to meta-analyze differences in variances with summary data. Results: In the single trial, there was agreement between methods, and the difference in variance was largely due to differences in prevalence of depression at baseline. In two meta-analyses, most individual trials did not show strong evidence of a difference in variance between arms, with wide confidence intervals. However, both meta-analyses showed evidence of greater variance in the control arm, and in one example, this was perhaps because mean outcome in the control arm was higher. Conclusions: Using meta-analysis, we overcame low power of individual trials to examine differences in variance using meta-analysis. Evidence of differences in variance should be followed up to identify potential effect modifiers and explore other possible causes such as varying compliance. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.