Duodenal ulcer perforation: A systematic literature review and narrative description of surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal defects. Issue 4 (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clinch, Darja; Damaskos, Dimitrios; Di Marzo, Fransesco; Di Saverio, Salomone
• Is Part Of: Journal of trauma and acute care surgery. Volume 91:Issue 4(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: Giant duodenal ulcer perforation -- omental plug -- triple tube technique -- pancreas-preserving duodenal resection; Surgical intensive care -- Periodicals; Surgical emergencies -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.026
• DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003357
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2163-0755

Abstract

Abstract : BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on optimal surgical treatment of large duodenal defects arising from perforated ulcers, even though such defects are challenging to repair and inadequate repair is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic literature review of different surgical techniques used to treat large duodenal perforations, provide a narrative description of these techniques, and propose a framework for approaching this pathology. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for articles published in English between January 1, 1970, and December 1, 2020. Studies describing surgical techniques used to treat giant duodenal ulcer perforation and their outcomes in adult patients were included. No quantitative analysis was planned because of the heterogeneity across studies. RESULTS: Out of 960 identified records, 25 studies were eligible for inclusion. Two randomized controlled trials, one case-control trial, three cohort studies, 14 case series, and 5 case reports were included. Eight main surgical approaches are described, ranging from simple damage-control operations, such as the omental plug and triple-tube techniques, all the way to complex resections, such as gastrectomy. CONCLUSION: Evidence on surgical treatment of large duodenal defects is of poor quality, with the majority of studies corresponding to Oxford levels 3b-4. Current evidence does not support any single surgical technique as superior in terms of morbidity or mortality, but choice of technique should be guided by several factors including location of the perforation, degree of duodenal tissue loss, hemodynamic stability of the patient, as well as expertise of the operating surgeon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: SR with more than two negative criteria, Level IV.