Pressure Injury Prevention for Complex Cardiovascular Patients in the Operating Room and Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project. Issue 6 (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pittman, Joyce; Horvath, Dawn; Beeson, Terrie; Bailey, Karrie; Mills, Annie; Kaiser, Laura; Hall, Deborah K.; Sweeney, Jennifer
• Is Part Of: Journal of WOCN. Volume 48:Issue 6(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Alternating air pressure overlay -- Cardiovascular -- Critical care -- Hospital-acquired pressure injuries -- Intensive care -- Operation room -- Pressure injury -- Pressure ulcer -- Prevention -- Quality improvement; Abdomen -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Abdomen -- Wounds and injuries -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Bedsores -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Fecal incontinence -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Enterostomy -- Nursing -- Periodicals; Urinary incontinence -- Nursing -- Periodicals; 610.73
• DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000815
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1071-5754

Abstract

Abstract : PURPOSE: The purpose of our project was to examine the effect of an alternating pressure (AP) overlay on hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) in high-risk cardiovascular surgical patients. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: This quality improvement (QI) initiative was conducted in a core group of 8 cardiovascular operating room (OR) suites and 1 cardiovascular surgical critical intensive care unit (ICU) in a large Indiana-based academic hospital. The sample comprised adult patients who underwent complex cardiovascular surgical procedures and those in the cardiovascular surgical ICU with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), ventricular assistive device (VAD), and undergoing heart and/or lung transplant, or open chest procedures. APPROACH: The AP overlay was placed on OR cardiovascular foam surfaces and on selected ICU support surfaces for patients who met inclusion criteria. We used a pre/postcomparative QI design to assess outcomes including OR-related HAPI rates, ICU aggregate unit HAPI data, related costs, and staff satisfaction during the 3-month project period. OUTCOMES: Operating room-related HAPIs were reduced from 8/71 (11%) preintervention to 0/147 (0%) postintervention ( P = .008), resulting in a cost avoidance of $323, 048 and positive staff satisfaction (mean = 3.85; 1- to 4-point Likert scale). No adverse outcomes occurred. Although not significant, ICU HAPI rates decreased from 10 to 7 pre/postintervention ( P = .29), demonstrating a 14% HAPI reduction with a cost avoidance of $121, 143. The ICU incidence density decreased from 3.57 to 3.24; however, there was no decrease in ICU monthly unit prevalence. Critical care staff satisfaction was positive (mean = 2.95; 1- to 4-point Likert scale) with most staff members preferring the AP overlay to a fluid immersion surface. A cost savings of 48% (AP overlay vs fluid immersion rental) was identified in the ICU. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We achieved fewer HAPIs and reduced costs and observed positive staff satisfaction, along with no adverse events with the use of the AP overlay. Further research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of this device for this pressure injury prevention option for immobile patients in both the OR and the ICU.