Multicenter Validation of a Deep Learning Detection Algorithm for Focal Cortical Dysplasia. (19th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gill, Ravnoor Singh; Lee, Hyo-Min; Caldairou, Benoit; Hong, Seok-Jun; Barba, Carmen; Deleo, Francesco; D'Incerti, Ludovico; Mendes Coelho, Vanessa Cristina; Lenge, Matteo; Semmelroch, Mira; Schrader, Dewi Victoria; Bartolomei, Fabrice; Guye, Maxime; Schulze-Bonhage, Andreas; Urbach, Horst; Cho, Kyoo Ho; Cendes, Fernando; Guerrini, Renzo; Jackson, Graeme; Hogan, R. Edward; Bernasconi, Neda; Bernasconi, Andrea
• Is Part Of: Neurology. Volume 97:Number 16(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-10-19
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurologie -- Périodiques; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012698
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3878

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objective: To test the hypothesis that a multicenter-validated computer deep learning algorithm detects MRI-negative focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). Methods: We used clinically acquired 3-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted and 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI of 148 patients (median age 23 years [range 2–55 years]; 47% female) with histologically verified FCD at 9 centers to train a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier. Images were initially deemed MRI-negative in 51% of patients, in whom intracranial EEG determined the focus. For risk stratification, the CNN incorporated bayesian uncertainty estimation as a measure of confidence. To evaluate performance, detection maps were compared to expert FCD manual labels. Sensitivity was tested in an independent cohort of 23 cases with FCD (13 ± 10 years). Applying the algorithm to 42 healthy controls and 89 controls with temporal lobe epilepsy disease tested specificity. Results: Overall sensitivity was 93% (137 of 148 FCD detected) using a leave-one-site-out cross-validation, with an average of 6 false positives per patient. Sensitivity in MRI-negative FCD was 85%. In 73% of patients, the FCD was among the clusters with the highest confidence; in half, it ranked the highest. Sensitivity in the independent cohort was 83% (19 of 23; average of 5 false positives per patient). Specificity was 89% in healthy and disease controls. Discussion: This first multicenter-validated deep learning detection algorithm yields the highest sensitivity to date in MRI-negative FCD. By pairing predictions with risk stratification, this classifier may assist clinicians in adjusting hypotheses relative to other tests, increasing diagnostic confidence. Moreover, generalizability across age and MRI hardware makes this approach ideal for presurgical evaluation of MRI-negative epilepsy. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that deep learning on multimodal MRI accurately identifies FCD in patients with epilepsy initially diagnosed as MRI negative.