Posterior instrumented fusion on lumbar stenosis syndrome can bring benefit to proximal degenerative kyphosis: A CONSORT-compliant article. Issue 45 (12th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xu, Shuai; Guo, Chen; Liang, Yan; Zhu, Zhenqi; Zhang, Hongguang; Liu, Haiying
• Other Names: Kim. Hyeun Sung section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 100:Issue 45(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11-12
• Subjects: degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis -- lower instrumented vertebrae -- lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome -- osteoporosis -- pelvic incidence -- pelvic tilt -- sacral slope -- short-level fixation -- spino-pelvic alignment; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027711
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: The effect on degenerative thoracolumbar kyphosis (DTLK) after short-segment instrument for lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome (LSS) remains controversial. Based on the biomechanics and compensatory of the global spino-pelvic alignment, it was assumed that the interference on the lumbar spine, instead of the thoracolumbar segment, could still make a difference on the proximal spine. To explore whether DTLK could improve with only surgery for LSS and identify influencing factors on postoperative TLK. The study was performed from January 2016 to December 2018. Sixty-nine participants (25 male) diagnosed LSS with DTLK were enrolled and surgery was only for LSS. Radiological parameters included TLK, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and osteoporosis. Clinical outcomes were visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index. According to lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) on L5 or S1, inter-group comparisons were performed between LIV on L5 (L5 group) and S1 (S1 group). Demographics were well-matched between L5 and S1 group with a mean follow-up of 24.3 ± 12.1 (m). TLK improved with a mean of 16.2 ± 7.6 (°) ( P < .001). There was no significance on radiological and clinical parameters between L5 and S1 groups except for a larger pelvic tilt in S1 group ( P = .046). Visual analogue scale ( P = .787) and Oswestry disability index ( P = .530) were both indifferent between normal TLK and DTLK at last ( P > .05). Postoperative TLK was affected by osteoporosis and sacral slope, the latter was dominated by pelvic incidence and pelvic rotation. Osteoporosis was the risk factor for TLK correction ( P = .001, odd risk = 9.58). DTLK decreased if instrument only performed for LSS, where TLK and clinical outcomes are comparably affected whether L5 or S1 is selected as LIV. This study supplements the compensatory mechanism of spino-pelvic alignment, especially for cases with severe osteoporosis.