Arthroscopic assessment of syndesmotic instability: Are we pulling correctly in the coronal plane?. Issue 1 (January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bhimani, Rohan; Lubberts, Bart; Hagemeijer, Noortje C.; Zhao, John; Saengsin, Jirawat; DiGiovanni, Christopher W.; Guss, Daniel
• Is Part Of: Foot and ankle surgery. Volume 29:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 67
• Page End: 71
• Publication Date: 2023-01
• Subjects: Syndesmosis -- Hook test -- Instability -- Arthroscopy, distal tibiofibular joint -- Diagnosis; Foot -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- surgery -- Periodicals; Foot -- surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery; Foot -- Surgery; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.58
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.09.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1268-7731

Abstract

Abstract: Background: While the lateral hook test (LHT) has been widely used to arthroscopically evaluate syndesmotic instability in the coronal plane, it is unclear whether the angulation of the applied force has any impact on the degree of instability. We aimed to determine if changing the direction of the force applied while performing the LHT impacts the amount of coronal diastasis observed in subtle syndesmotic injuries. Methods: In 10 cadaveric specimens, arthroscopic evaluation of the syndesmotic joint was performed by measuring anterior and posterior-third coronal plane diastasis in the intact state, and repeated after sequential transection of the 1) anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), 2) interosseous ligament (IOL), and 3) posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL). In all scenarios, LHT was performed under 100 N of laterally directed force. Additionally, LHT was also performed under: 1) anterior inclination of 15 degrees and 2) posterior inclination of 15 degrees in intact and AITFL+IOL deficient state. Results: Compared to the intact state, the syndesmosis became unstable after AITFL +IOL transection under laterally directed force with no angulation (p = 0.029 and 0.025 for anterior and posterior-third diastasis, respectively), which worsened with subsequent PITFL transection (p = <0.001). Moreover, there was no statistical difference in anterior and posterior-third coronal diastasis in both intact and AITFL+IOL deficient states under neutral, anterior, and posteriorly directed force (p-values ranging from 0.816 to 0.993 and 0.396–0.80, respectively). However, in AITFL+IOL transected state, posteriorly directed forces resulted in greater diastasis than neutral or anteriorly directed forces. Conclusions: Angulation of the applied force ranging from 15 degrees anteriorly to 15 degrees posteriorly during intraoperative LHT has no effect on coronal plane measurements in patients with subtle syndesmotic instability. On the other hand, posteriorly directed forces result in more sizable diastasis, potentially increasing their sensitivity. Clinical relevance: When arthroscopically evaluating subtle syndesmotic instability, clinicians should assess coronal diastasis with the hook angled 15 degrees posteriorly.