Factors affecting lymph node sampling patterns and the impact on survival of lymph node density in patients with Wilms tumor: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database review. Issue 1 (February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walker, Jonathan P.; Johnson, Jared S.; Eguchi, Megan M.; Saltzman, Amanda F.; Cockburn, Myles; Cost, Nicholas G.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric urology. Volume 16:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 81
• Page End: 88
• Publication Date: 2020-02
• Subjects: Wilms tumor -- nephroblastoma -- lymph node density -- pediatric; Pediatric urology -- Periodicals; Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals; Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals; Urologic Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Child; Infant; Urologie pédiatrique -- Périodiques; Appareil urinaire -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Pédiatrie; Urologie; Pediatric urology; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.926
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.030
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-5131

Abstract

Summary: Background: Lymph node (LN) involvement is an important prognostic indicator for patients with Wilms tumor (WT), and there have been previous reports of utilizing LN density (LND = positive LN/LNs examined) as an advanced metric to risk-stratify patients with WT. Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe patient characteristics that affect LN yield and assess the effect of LND on the overall survival (OS) in patients with WT, with the expectation that patients with LNDs above a critical cut-point would demonstrate lower OS. Study design: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database was queried for all patients diagnosed with unilateral WT from 2004 to 2015. Patient and disease characteristics were collected, and Poisson regression was used to identify characteristics correlated with LN yield. LND was calculated for LN-positive patients, and multivariable survival analysis was performed, including patient demographics and LND as variables. Results: 1489 patients with unilateral WT were identified for analysis, 231 (15.51%) of whom were LN-positive. Median patient age at diagnosis was three years (IQR 1–5). On Poisson regression, the year of diagnosis, patient age, tumor size and laterality, and stage were found to impact LN yield. For patients with positive LNs, five-year OS of patients with LNDs above 0.4 was worse than those below 0.4 (76.1% vs 89.6%, p = 0.041). On multivariable analysis, tumor size and LND remained significant predictors of OS. Discussion: Administrative databases such as SEER provide an excellent resource for studying conditions where large patient numbers for analysis are difficult to obtain. Unfortunately, the SEER database is unable to account for every factor that could affect LN sampling patterns. Additionally, favorable vs unfavorable histology is not available in SEER, and SEER utilizes its own staging system, which makes comparison to Children's Oncology Group staging difficult. Despite these limitations, the findings of this study are similar to those previously published using administrative databases analyzing LN sampling patterns and the effect of LND on OS in WT. Conclusions: Analysis of the SEER database confirms that there are several patient- and disease-specific factors that affect the number of LNs sampled during nephrectomy for WT, and that LND may be a predictor of OS. These findings highlight the need for standardization of LN sampling patterns for pediatric renal tumors and support the investigation of LND in future studies to further risk-stratify WT patients to tailor therapy intensity.