Advancing the potential impact of future scenarios by integrating psychological principles. Issue 140 (February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Richter, Isabell; Gabe-Thomas, Elizabeth; Queirós, Ana M.; Sheppard, Stephen R.J.; Pahl, Sabine
• Is Part Of: Environmental science & policy. Issue 140(2023)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 79
• Publication Date: 2023-02
• Subjects: Sustainable development -- Future scenarios -- Climate change -- Cognitive biases -- Emotions -- Co-creation; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Sciences de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Environmental policy; Environmental sciences; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70561
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-9011

Abstract

Abstract: Engaging with the future to make better decisions in the present is key for sustainable development and climate change responses. In this conceptual paper, we suggest a scenario building approach that connects psychological principles of future thinking with future scenario development in order to advance the impact of scenarios. Future scenario work currently does not sufficiently consider processes of human communication, emotion, cognition and has only begun to focus on people's local contexts in recent years. We argue that more understanding of psychological processes, such as cognitive biases and heuristics, as well as psychological distance, which typically occur in future thinking, can improve the impact of scenarios. Specifically, we provide a psychological basis for systematically integrating emotion-evoking aspects into future scenario development, using tailored narratives and visuals to make content tangible and meaningful for a broad spectrum of audiences, and adapting content temporally, spatially, and linguistically to audiences, in combination with inclusive and creative co-creation of scenarios and sustainable solutions. We explain why this approach has the potential to overcome some recognised cognitive biases hampering scenario impact and intended sustainable change processes, and can therefore support the co-development of sustainable and inclusive policies and solutions that empower and connect individuals, communities, and decision makers. Highlights: Future scenarios are developed and communicated with little attention to cognitive biases and constraints. Bringing a psychological dimension into scenario development and communication can optimize their uptake. We recommend integrating emotions, narratives and visuals and to apply co-creation of scenarios, including tailoring to local circumstances. Considering human perceptions, emotions and behaviour might advance the impact of future scenarios for sustainable change.