Phase I/randomized phase II study of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, with or without protracted temozolomide in adults with recurrent glioblastoma. Issue 3 (19th August 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Phase I/randomized phase II study of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, with or without protracted temozolomide in adults with recurrent glioblastoma. Issue 3 (19th August 2014)
- Main Title:
- Phase I/randomized phase II study of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, with or without protracted temozolomide in adults with recurrent glioblastoma
- Authors:
- Reardon, David A.
Nabors, Louis B.
Mason, Warren P.
Perry, James R.
Shapiro, William
Kavan, Petr
Mathieu, David
Phuphanich, Surasak
Cseh, Agnieszka
Fu, Yali
Cong, Julie
Wind, Sven
Eisenstat, David D.
Reardon, David
Wen, Patrick
Mikkelson, Tom
Portnow, Jana
Giglio, Pierre
Lai, Rose
New, Pamela
Shapiro, William
Phuphanich, Surasak
Nabors, Louis
Fink, Karen
Chowdhary, Sajeel
Madison, Michael
Taylor, Lynn
Hadjipanayis, Constantinos
Madarnas, Yolanda
Kavan, Petr
Perry, James
Mason, Warren
Easaw, Jacob
Vallières, Isabelle
Mathieu, David
Hirte, Hal
Whitlock, Pierre
Eisenstat, David
MacNeil, Mary V.
Bolonna, Anusha
Reardon, David A.
Cseh, Agnieszka
Fu, Yali
Cong, Julie
Wind, Sven
Eisenstat, David D.
Nabors, Louis B.
Mason, Warren P.
Perry, James R.
Shapiro, William
Kavan, Petr
Mathieu, David
Phuphanich, Surasak
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: This phase I/II trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of afatinib plus temozolomide as well as the efficacy and safety of afatinib as monotherapy (A) or with temozolomide (AT) vs temozolomide monotherapy (T) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Methods: Phase I followed a traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design to determine MTD. Treatment cohorts were: afatinib 20, 40, and 50 mg/day (plus temozolomide 75 mg/m 2 /day for 21 days per 28-day cycle). In phase II, participants were randomized (stratified by age and KPS) to receive A, T or AT; A was dosed at 40 mg/day and T at 75 mg/m 2 for 21 of 28 days. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6). Participants were treated until intolerable adverse events (AEs) or disease progression. Results: Recommended phase II dose was 40 mg/day (A) + T based on safety data from phase I ( n = 32). Most frequent AEs in phase II ( n = 119) were diarrhea (71% [A], 82% [AT]) and rash (71% [A] and 69% [AT]). Afatinib and temozolomide pharmacokinetics were unaffected by coadministration. Independently assessed PFS-6 rate was 3% (A), 10% (AT), and 23% (T). Median PFS was longer in afatinib-treated participants with epidermal growth factor receptor (EFGR) vIII-positive tumors versus EGFRvIII-negative tumors. Best overall response included partial response in 1 (A), 2 (AT), and 4 (T) participants and stable disease in 14 (A), 14 (AT), and 21 (T) participants.Abstract: Background: This phase I/II trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of afatinib plus temozolomide as well as the efficacy and safety of afatinib as monotherapy (A) or with temozolomide (AT) vs temozolomide monotherapy (T) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Methods: Phase I followed a traditional 3 + 3 dose-escalation design to determine MTD. Treatment cohorts were: afatinib 20, 40, and 50 mg/day (plus temozolomide 75 mg/m 2 /day for 21 days per 28-day cycle). In phase II, participants were randomized (stratified by age and KPS) to receive A, T or AT; A was dosed at 40 mg/day and T at 75 mg/m 2 for 21 of 28 days. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6). Participants were treated until intolerable adverse events (AEs) or disease progression. Results: Recommended phase II dose was 40 mg/day (A) + T based on safety data from phase I ( n = 32). Most frequent AEs in phase II ( n = 119) were diarrhea (71% [A], 82% [AT]) and rash (71% [A] and 69% [AT]). Afatinib and temozolomide pharmacokinetics were unaffected by coadministration. Independently assessed PFS-6 rate was 3% (A), 10% (AT), and 23% (T). Median PFS was longer in afatinib-treated participants with epidermal growth factor receptor (EFGR) vIII-positive tumors versus EGFRvIII-negative tumors. Best overall response included partial response in 1 (A), 2 (AT), and 4 (T) participants and stable disease in 14 (A), 14 (AT), and 21 (T) participants. Conclusions: Afatinib has a manageable safety profile but limited single-agent activity in unselected recurrent GBM patients. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuro-oncology. Volume 17:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Neuro-oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 17:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 17, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 17
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0017-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 430
- Page End:
- 439
- Publication Date:
- 2014-08-19
- Subjects:
- afatinib -- EGFRvIII -- ErbB family -- glioblastoma -- temozolomide
Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals
Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99481 - Journal URLs:
- http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org/ ↗
http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/content?genre=journal&issn=1522-8517 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuonc/nou160 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1522-8517
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.288000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25000.xml