Implementation and calibration of active small female and average male human body models using low-speed frontal sled tests. (10th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Devane, Karan; Chan, Hana; Albert, Devon; Kemper, Andrew; Gayzik, F. Scott
• Is Part Of: Traffic injury prevention. Volume 23(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S44
• Page End: S49
• Publication Date: 2022-10-10
• Subjects: Active muscle -- computational modeling -- human body models -- GHBMC; Traffic safety -- Periodicals; Traffic accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 363.125
• DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2114078
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1538-9588

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to implement active muscles in a computationally efficient small female finite element model (54.1 kg, 149.9 cm) suitable for predicting occupant response during precrash braking and low-speed frontal sled tests. We further calibrate and compare its results against an average male model (78.4 kg, 174.9 cm) using the same developmental approach. Methods: The active female model (F05-OS + Active) was developed by adding active skeletal muscle elements ( n = 232) to the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) 5th percentile female simplified occupant model (F05-OS v2.3). The muscle properties and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) for each muscle were taken from the M50-OS + Active v2.3 model but PCSAs were mass scaled to a 5th percentile female. A total of 8 simulations were conducted; 2 acceleration pulses (1.0 g and 2.5 g ), 2 models (F05-OS + Active and M50-OS + Active), and 2 muscle states (activation and control; e.g., no activation). Each model's kinematics and reaction forces were compared with experimental data. Occupant responses of 6 5th percentile female and 6 50th percentile male volunteers ( n = 12 total) were used. The data depict occupant response in precrash braking and low-speed frontal sled tests in a rigid test buck. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Virginia Tech institutional review board. Each volunteer was in a relaxed state before the applied acceleration. Results: The occupant peak forward excursion results of both active models reasonably match the volunteer data for both pulse severities. The differences between active and control models were found to be significant by Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( p < .05). The reaction loads of the active and control models lie within the experimental corridors. Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to concurrently calibrate and compare equivalently developed computational models of females and males in precrash and low-speed impacts. The modeling approach is capable of capturing the varied kinematics observed in the relaxed condition, which may be an important factor in studies focused on the effects of low- g vehicle dynamics on the occupant position. Finally, the computationally efficient modeling approach is imperative given the long duration (>500 ms) of the events simulated.