Outcome Value and Task Aversiveness Impact Task Procrastination through Separate Neural Pathways. (12th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Shunmin; Verguts, Tom; Zhang, Chenyan; Feng, Pan; Chen, Qi; Feng, Tingyong
• Is Part Of: Cerebral cortex. Volume 31:Number 8(2021)
• Page Start: 3846
• Page End: 3855
• Publication Date: 2021-04-12
• Subjects: amygdale–insula coupling -- dual-process theory -- hippocampus-striatum coupling -- procrastination -- task valuation; Cerebral cortex -- Periodicals; Brain -- Periodicals; 612.825
• DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1047-3211

Abstract

Abstract: The temporal decision model of procrastination has proposed that outcome value and task aversiveness are two separate aspects accounting for procrastination. If true, the human brain is likely to implicate separate neural pathways to mediate the effect of outcome value and task aversiveness on procrastination. Outcome value is plausibly constructed via a hippocampus-based pathway because of the hippocampus's unique role in episodic prospection. In contrast, task aversiveness might be represented through an amygdala-involved pathway. In the current study, participants underwent fMRI scanning when viewing both tasks and future outcomes, without any experimental instruction imposed. The results revealed that outcome value increased activations in the caudate, and suppressed procrastination through a hippocampus-caudate pathway. In contrast, task aversiveness increased activations in the anterior insula, and increased procrastination via an amygdala–insula pathway. In sum, this study demonstrates that people can incorporate both outcome value and task aversiveness into task valuation to decide whether to procrastinate or not; and it elucidates the separate neural pathways via which this occurs.