Are brood sex ratios adaptive?—The effect of experimentally altered brood sex ratio on nestling growth, mortality and recruitment. (14th November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Are brood sex ratios adaptive?—The effect of experimentally altered brood sex ratio on nestling growth, mortality and recruitment. (14th November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Are brood sex ratios adaptive?—The effect of experimentally altered brood sex ratio on nestling growth, mortality and recruitment
- Authors:
- Szász, Eszter
Sarkadi, Fanni
Szöllősi, Eszter
Kopena, Renáta
Török, János
Rosivall, Balázs - Abstract:
- Abstract: Brood sex ratios (BSRs) have often been found to be nonrandom in respect of parental and environmental quality, and many hypotheses suggest that nonrandom sex ratios can be adaptive. To specifically test the adaptive value of biased BSRs, it is crucial to disentangle the consequences of BSR and maternal effects. In multiparous species, this requires cross‐fostering experiments where foster parents rear offspring originating from multiple broods, and where the interactive effect of original and manipulated BSR on fitness components is tested. To our knowledge, our study on collared flycatchers ( Ficedula albicollis ) is the first that meets these requirements. In this species, where BSRs had previously been shown to be related to parental characteristics, we altered the original BSR of the parents shortly after hatching by cross‐fostering nestlings among trios of broods and examined the effects on growth, mortality and recruitment of the nestlings. We found that original and experimental BSR, as well as the interaction of the two, were unrelated to the fitness components considered. Nestling growth was related only to background variables, namely brood size and hatching rank. Nestling mortality was related only to hatching asynchrony. Our results therefore do not support that the observed BSRs are adaptive in our study population. However, we cannot exclude the possibility of direct effects of experimentally altered BSRs on parental fitness, which should beAbstract: Brood sex ratios (BSRs) have often been found to be nonrandom in respect of parental and environmental quality, and many hypotheses suggest that nonrandom sex ratios can be adaptive. To specifically test the adaptive value of biased BSRs, it is crucial to disentangle the consequences of BSR and maternal effects. In multiparous species, this requires cross‐fostering experiments where foster parents rear offspring originating from multiple broods, and where the interactive effect of original and manipulated BSR on fitness components is tested. To our knowledge, our study on collared flycatchers ( Ficedula albicollis ) is the first that meets these requirements. In this species, where BSRs had previously been shown to be related to parental characteristics, we altered the original BSR of the parents shortly after hatching by cross‐fostering nestlings among trios of broods and examined the effects on growth, mortality and recruitment of the nestlings. We found that original and experimental BSR, as well as the interaction of the two, were unrelated to the fitness components considered. Nestling growth was related only to background variables, namely brood size and hatching rank. Nestling mortality was related only to hatching asynchrony. Our results therefore do not support that the observed BSRs are adaptive in our study population. However, we cannot exclude the possibility of direct effects of experimentally altered BSRs on parental fitness, which should be evaluated in the future. In addition, studies similar to ours are required on various species to get a clearer picture of the adaptive value of nonrandom BSRs. Abstract : Brood sex ratios (BSRs) are often found to be nonrandom in respect of parental or environmental quality, and this phenomenon is assumed to be adaptive, although experimental studies on the fitness consequences of BSRs are scarce. We conducted a cross‐fostering experiment in collared flycatchers to reveal the effects of original and manipulated BSRs on the fitness components of the nestlings. As neither the original nor the manipulated BSRs were related to offspring performance, we found no evidence of adaptive sex ratio adjustment in our study population. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of evolutionary biology. Volume 36:Number 1(2023)
- Journal:
- Journal of evolutionary biology
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Number 1(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 1 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0036-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 156
- Page End:
- 168
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-14
- Subjects:
- adaptivity -- cross‐fostering -- fitness -- nestling development -- rearing conditions -- recapture probability -- sex allocation -- sex ratio adjustment
Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals
Biology -- Periodicals
576.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1420-9101 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=jeb ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1010-061x;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jeb.14118 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1010-061X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4979.642100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24994.xml