Improving the port selection process during military deployments. Issue 2 (26th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Longhorn, Dave C.; Muckensturm, Joshua R.; Baybordi, Shelby V.
• Is Part Of: Journal of defense analytics and logistics. Volume 5:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 131
• Page End: 151
• Publication Date: 2021-10-26
• Subjects: Port choice -- Port selection factors -- Military logistics -- Integer programming -- Paired-samples t-test; Military art and science -- Periodicals; Military research -- Periodicals; Defense industries -- Periodicals; Logistics -- Periodicals; 355.4
• DOI: 10.1108/JDAL-04-2021-0003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2399-6439

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: This paper recommends new criteria for selecting seaports of embarkation during military deployments. Most importantly, this research compares the current port selection criterion, which is to select the seaport with the shortest inland transport time from the deploying installation, to the proposed port selection criteria, which are to select the seaport based on the shortest combined inland and oceanic transit time to the destination theater. Design/methodology/approach: The authors construct an original integer program to select seaports that minimize the expected delivery timeline for a set of notional, but realistic, deployment requirements. The integer program is solved considering the current as well as the proposed port selection criteria. The solutions are then compared using paired-samples t -tests to assess the statistical significance of the port selection criteria. Findings: This work suggests that the current port selection criterion results in a 10–13% slower delivery of deploying forces as compared to the proposed port selection criteria. Research limitations/implications: This work assumes deterministic inland transit times, oceanic transit times, and seaport processing rates. Operational fluctuations in transit times and processing rates are not expected to change the findings from this research. Practical implications: This research provides evidence that the current port selection criterion for selecting seaports for military units deploying from the Continental United States is suboptimal. More importantly, logistics planners could use these recommended port selection criteria to reduce the expected delivery timelines during military deployments. Originality/value: Several military doctrinal references suggest that planners select seaports based on habitual installation-to-port pairings, especially for early deployers. This work recommends a change to the military's current port selection process based on empirical analyses that show improvements to deployment timelines.