3D MR fingerprinting (MRF) for simultaneous T1 and T2 quantification of the bone metastasis: Initial validation in prostate cancer patients. Issue 144 (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Choi, Moon Hyung; Lee, Sheen-Woo; Kim, Hyun Gi; Kim, Jee Young; Oh, Se Won; Han, Dongyeob; Kim, Dong-Hyun
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 144(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Quantification -- Magnetic resonance fingerprinting -- Bone marrow pathology -- Prostate cancer; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109990
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Highlights: MR fingerprinting allows simultaneous generation of T1 and T2 maps. Feasibility Results of MRF for prostate cancer metastasis in the pelvic bone. Significant differences in MRF-values between bone metastasis and normal bone. Significant differences in MRF-values between treated and untreated metastasis. Better AUROC of MRF-values than ADC value to differentiate metastasis from normal bone. Abstract: Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of using 3-dimensional MRF for bone marrow evaluation in the field of view of prostate MRI for T1 and T2 quantification of prostate cancer bone metastases, as well as comparing it to the ADC value. Methods: In this retrospective study, 30 prostate MRIs were included: 14 cases with prostate cancer bone metastasis and 16 cases without prostate cancer (control). MRF was obtained twice before (nonenhanced [NE] MRF) and after contrast injection (contrast-enhanced [CE] MRF), and T1 and T2 maps were generated from each MRF. Two radiologists independently drew regions of interest (ROIs) on the MRF maps and the ADC maps. Mann-Whitney U tests and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) evaluated the two-reader means of T1, T2 and ADC values between bone metastasis and normal bone. Results: There were 83 ROIs, including 39 bone metastases and 44 normal bone. The two-reader average ADC, NE T2 and CE T2 values were significantly lower and NE T1 and CE T1 values were significantly higher in metastatic bone compared with normal bone ( P < 0.001). The AUROC of the ADC was lowest (0.685), which was significantly lower than those of NE T1 (1.0, P = 0.001), NE T2 (0.932, P = 0.004), and CE T2 (0.876, P = 0.031). Conclusion: MRF to assess the pelvic bone during a prostate gland evaluation provides a reliable parametric map for skeletal work-up. With higher diagnostic performance than the ADC value, NE MRF is a potential alternative for quantifying bone marrow metastases in prostate cancer patients.