Added value of hybrid myocardial perfusion SPECT and CT coronary angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. (29th July 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schaap, Jeroen; de Groot, Joris A.H.; Nieman, Koen; Meijboom, W. Bob; Boekholdt, S. Matthijs; Kauling, Robert M.; Post, Martijn C.; Van der Heyden, Jan A.; de Kroon, Thom L.; Rensing, Benno J.W.M.; Moons, Karel G.M.; Verzijlbergen, J. Fred
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 15:Number 11(2014:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1281
• Page End: 1288
• Publication Date: 2014-07-29
• Subjects: Added value -- Hybrid imaging -- Myocardial perfusion SPECT -- Coronary computed tomography angiography; Cardiovascular system -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Heart -- Imaging -- Periodicals; 616.10754
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu135
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-2404

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Hybrid single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has only been evaluated for its diagnostic accuracy as a single test in patients suspected of significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Added value of hybrid SPECT/CCTA beyond usual clinical work-up, or use of each of these tests separately, remains unclear. We evaluated the added value of hybrid myocardial perfusion SPECT (SPECT) and CCTA, beyond pre-test likelihood and exercise stress ECG (X-ECG), in the diagnosis of CAD. Methods and results: Two hundred and five patients with stable angina pectoris and intermediate-to-high pre-test likelihood were prospectively included. All patients underwent clinical history and examination, X-ECG, stress and rest SPECT, coronary calcium scoring (CCS) and CCTA. Fractional flow reserve measurement <0.80 or a lesion >50% on coronary angiography (CA) served as reference standard for significant CAD. Multiple imputation was used to correct for missing test results (17–20%). Added value of hybrid SPECT/CCTA to the basic model of pre-test likelihood plus X-ECG was quantified using logistic regression analysis. Model differences were then assessed using differences in C -index and in net reclassification improvement (NRI). The basic model had a C -index of 0.73 (95%CI 0.66–0.80). This significantly increased to 0.85 (95%CI 0.80–0.91) by addition of only SPECT, to 0.90 (95%CI 0.85–0.94) when adding only CCTA, and to 0.96 (95%CI 0.92–0.99) when adding hybrid SPECT/CCTA. The accompanying NRIs were 0.82 (95%CI 0.62–1.02), 0.86 (95%CI 0.66–1.06) and 1.57 (95%CI 1.11–1.59) respectively. Conclusion: Current analysis resembles clinical routine of layered testing and shows that hybrid SPECT/CCTA imaging has a substantially higher yield than standalone SPECT or CCTA in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of significant CAD.