Implications of Moving Public Opinion Surveys to a Single-Frame Cell-Phone Random-Digit-Dial Design. Issue 2 (24th May 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Implications of Moving Public Opinion Surveys to a Single-Frame Cell-Phone Random-Digit-Dial Design. Issue 2 (24th May 2018)
- Main Title:
- Implications of Moving Public Opinion Surveys to a Single-Frame Cell-Phone Random-Digit-Dial Design
- Authors:
- Kennedy, Courtney
McGeeney, Kyley
Keeter, Scott
Patten, Eileen
Perrin, Andrew
Lee, Amanda
Best, Jonathan - Abstract:
- Abstract: With the share of US adults living in households with cell phones climbing over 90 percent (Blumberg and Luke 2016 ), survey researchers are considering whether it is necessary to continue sampling landlines in addition to cell phones in RDD surveys. This transition raises a number of questions, including whether it will systematically change public opinion estimates, subgroup estimates, long-standing trends, as well as precision. To address these questions, we analyzed data from Pew Research Center national dual-frame RDD surveys conducted from 2012 to 2015. We compared the final survey estimates to those computed with an experimental weight that excluded the landline sample, thus simulating a single-frame cell-phone design. Analysis of more than 250 survey questions shows that when landlines are excluded, estimates change by less than one percentage point, on average. In addition, responding samples of adults reached via cell phone are much more demographically representative of the United States than responding samples of adults reached via landline, thus requiring less aggressive weighting and yielding lower design effects and smaller margins of error, relative to dual-frame RDD. While most estimates commonly reported from public opinion surveys seem unaffected by this design change, there are some exceptions. While considerations of cost and concerns about maximizing the population coverage rate may continue to favor dual-frame RDD for some time, these resultsAbstract: With the share of US adults living in households with cell phones climbing over 90 percent (Blumberg and Luke 2016 ), survey researchers are considering whether it is necessary to continue sampling landlines in addition to cell phones in RDD surveys. This transition raises a number of questions, including whether it will systematically change public opinion estimates, subgroup estimates, long-standing trends, as well as precision. To address these questions, we analyzed data from Pew Research Center national dual-frame RDD surveys conducted from 2012 to 2015. We compared the final survey estimates to those computed with an experimental weight that excluded the landline sample, thus simulating a single-frame cell-phone design. Analysis of more than 250 survey questions shows that when landlines are excluded, estimates change by less than one percentage point, on average. In addition, responding samples of adults reached via cell phone are much more demographically representative of the United States than responding samples of adults reached via landline, thus requiring less aggressive weighting and yielding lower design effects and smaller margins of error, relative to dual-frame RDD. While most estimates commonly reported from public opinion surveys seem unaffected by this design change, there are some exceptions. While considerations of cost and concerns about maximizing the population coverage rate may continue to favor dual-frame RDD for some time, these results demonstrate that by and large public opinion researchers have little to fear and potentially much to gain when landlines become a thing of the past. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Public opinion quarterly. Volume 82:Issue 2(2018)
- Journal:
- Public opinion quarterly
- Issue:
- Volume 82:Issue 2(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 82, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 82
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0082-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 279
- Page End:
- 299
- Publication Date:
- 2018-05-24
- Subjects:
- Public opinion -- Periodicals
Public opinion
Periodicals
303.38 - Journal URLs:
- http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/POQ/journal/index.html ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/0033362X.html ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0033-362x;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/poq/nfy016 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0033-362X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6967.850000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24971.xml