Comparison of two procedures for microplastics analysis in sediments based on an interlaboratory exercise. (February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Langknecht, Troy; Lao, Wenjian; Wong, Charles S.; Kotar, Syd; El Khatib, Dounia; Robinson, Sandra; Burgess, Robert M.; Ho, Kay T.
• Is Part Of: Chemosphere. Volume 313(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-02
• Subjects: Microplastics -- Sediments -- Method comparison -- Spectroscopy -- Visual microscopy; Pollution -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Physiological effect -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Atmospheric chemistry -- Periodicals; 551.511
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137479
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0045-6535

Abstract

Abstract: Microplastics (MP) are distributed throughout ecosystems and settle into sediments where they may threaten benthic communities; however, methods for quantifying MP in sediments have not been standardized. This study compares two methods for analyzing MP in sediments, including extraction and identification, and provides recommendations for improvement. Two laboratories processed sediment samples using two methods, referred to as "core" and "augmentation", and identified particles with visual microscopy and spectroscopy. Using visual microscopy, the augmentation method yielded mean recoveries (78%) significantly greater than the core (47%) (p = 0.03), likely due to the use of separatory funnels in the former. Spectroscopic recovery of particles was lower at 42 and 54% for the core and augmentation methods, respectively. We suspect the visual identification recoveries are overestimations from erroneous identification of non-plastic materials persisting post-extraction, indicating visual identification alone is not an accurate method to identify MP, particularly in complex matrices like sediment. However, both Raman and FTIR proved highly accurate at identifying recovered MP, with 96.7% and 99.8% accuracy, respectively. Low spectroscopic recovery of spiked particles indicates that MP recovery from sediments is lower than previously assumed, and MP may be more abundant in sediments than current analyses suggest. To our knowledge, likely due to the excessive time/labor-intensity associated with MP analyses, this is the first interlaboratory study to quantify complete method performance (extraction, identification) for sediments, with regards to capabilities and limitations. This is essential as regulatory bodies move toward long-term environmental MP monitoring. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: A novel augmentation method achieved greater recovery, likely due to the use of separatory funnels rather than beakers. Visual identification likely overestimates MPs due to misidentification of non-plastic materials persisting post-extraction. Spectroscopic recovery was low, indicating that MP recovery from sediments is lower than previously assumed. MP may be more abundant in sediments than current MP analyses suggest. To our knowledge, this is the first interlaboratory study to compare both extraction and identification of MP in sediments.