Cognitive Imprecision and Small-Stakes Risk Aversion. (3rd August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Khaw, Mel Win; Li, Ziang; Woodford, Michael
• Is Part Of: Review of economic studies. Volume 88:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 1979
• Page End: 2013
• Publication Date: 2020-08-03
• Subjects: Weber's Law -- random utility -- prospect theory -- Rabin critique; C91 -- D03 -- D81 -- D87; Economics -- Periodicals; 330
• DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdaa044
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0034-6527

Abstract

Abstract: Observed choices between risky lotteries are difficult to reconcile with expected utility maximization, both because subjects appear to be too risk averse with regard to small gambles for this to be explained by diminishing marginal utility of wealth, as stressed by Rabin (2000), and because subjects' responses involve a random element. We propose a unified explanation for both anomalies, similar to the explanation given for related phenomena in the case of perceptual judgments: they result from judgments based on imprecise (and noisy) mental representations of the decision situation. In this model, risk aversion results from a sort of perceptual bias—but one that represents an optimal decision rule, given the limitations of the mental representation of the situation. We propose a quantitative model of the noisy mental representation of simple lotteries, based on other evidence regarding numerical cognition, and test its ability to explain the choice frequencies that we observe in a laboratory experiment.