Physical Distancing Behavior: The Role of Emotions, Personality, Motivations, and Moral Decision-Making. (22nd December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alivernini, Fabio; Manganelli, Sara; Girelli, Laura; Cozzolino, Mauro; Lucidi, Fabio; Cavicchiolo, Elisa
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric psychology. Volume 46:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 15
• Page End: 26
• Publication Date: 2020-12-22
• Subjects: health promotion and prevention -- longitudinal research -- mental health -- psychosocial functioning; Clinical child psychology -- Periodicals; 618.9289005
• DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa122
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0146-8693

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Physical distancing behavior (PDB) is a key disease prevention strategy for limiting the spread of COVID-19. In order to effectively encourage it among adolescents, it is necessary to understand the associated mental mechanisms. Health behavior theories suggest that emotions, personality, motivation, and moral disengagement could all play a role. On the basis of a longitudinal study, we investigated the importance of these factors in predicting PDB. Methods: The participants were 347 adolescents residing in Italy. Data were collected in four waves starting from 1 year before the pandemic. A structural equation model based on health behavior theory was tested. Results: After the COVID-19 national lockdown, adolescents experienced fewer positive emotions and more negative emotions compared with 1 year earlier. Nevertheless, these emotional changes, and adolescents' personality (except for openness to experiences), were not related to the adoption of PDB. Instead, the autonomous motivation of adolescents significantly predicted a higher likelihood to adopt PDB by increasing the intention to engage in this behavior and, more indirectly, by substantially decreasing moral disengagement, which was negatively related to PDB. In contrast, controlled motivation corresponded to significantly higher levels of moral disengagement and predicted less likelihood of adopting PDB. Conclusions: Messages and interventions targeted at adolescents should be oriented towards supporting autonomy, emphasizing the personal and social value of PDB. Communications should avoid the use of coercive strategies based on eliciting emotions such as shame and guilt in adolescents who do not adopt PDB, which appear to trigger off mechanisms of moral disengagement.