Normal tissue content impact on the GBM molecular classification. Issue 3 (7th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Madurga, Rodrigo; García-Romero, Noemí; Jiménez, Beatriz; Collazo, Ana; Pérez-Rodríguez, Francisco; Hernández-Laín, Aurelio; Fernández-Carballal, Carlos; Prat-Acín, Ricardo; Zanin, Massimiliano; Menasalvas, Ernestina; Ayuso-Sacido, Ángel
• Is Part Of: Briefings in bioinformatics. Volume 22:Issue 3(2021)
• Publication Date: 2020-07-07
• Subjects: glioblastoma -- molecular classification -- gliomas; Genetics -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Molecular biology -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Genomes -- Data processing -- Periodicals; 572.80285
• DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa129
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1467-5463

Abstract

Abstract: Molecular classification of glioblastoma has enabled a deeper understanding of the disease. The four-subtype model (including Proneural, Classical, Mesenchymal and Neural) has been replaced by a model that discards the Neural subtype, found to be associated with samples with a high content of normal tissue. These samples can be misclassified preventing biological and clinical insights into the different tumor subtypes from coming to light. In this work, we present a model that tackles both the molecular classification of samples and discrimination of those with a high content of normal cells. We performed a transcriptomic in silico analysis on glioblastoma (GBM) samples ( n = 810) and tested different criteria to optimize the number of genes needed for molecular classification. We used gene expression of normal brain samples ( n = 555) to design an additional gene signature to detect samples with a high normal tissue content. Microdissection samples of different structures within GBM ( n = 122) have been used to validate the final model. Finally, the model was tested in a cohort of 43 patients and confirmed by histology. Based on the expression of 20 genes, our model is able to discriminate samples with a high content of normal tissue and to classify the remaining ones. We have shown that taking into consideration normal cells can prevent errors in the classification and the subsequent misinterpretation of the results. Moreover, considering only samples with a low content of normal cells, we found an association between the complexity of the samples and survival for the three molecular subtypes.