Assessment of Isometric Knee Flexor Strength Using Hand-Held Dynamometry in High-Level Rugby Players Is Intertester Reliable. Issue 5 (September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Assessment of Isometric Knee Flexor Strength Using Hand-Held Dynamometry in High-Level Rugby Players Is Intertester Reliable. Issue 5 (September 2021)
- Main Title:
- Assessment of Isometric Knee Flexor Strength Using Hand-Held Dynamometry in High-Level Rugby Players Is Intertester Reliable
- Authors:
- van der Made, Anne D.
Paget, Liam D. A.
Altink, J. Nienke
Reurink, Gustaaf
Six, Willem R.
Tol, Johannes L.
Kerkhoffs, Gino M. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To assess intertester reliability of isometric knee flexor strength testing in high-level rugby players with testers of different physical capacity and different methods of dynamometer fixation. Design: Reliability study. Patients: Thirty noninjured high-level (Tegner Activity Score ≥9) rugby players, free from hamstring injury in the previous 2 months. Assessment: Isometric knee flexor strength (in N) in prone 0/15 degrees (hip/knee flexion) and supine 90/90 degrees position. Tests were performed by 1 female and 2 male testers whose upper-body strength was measured with a 6-repetition maximum bench press test. The prone 0/15 degrees measurement was performed with manual and external belt fixation of the dynamometer. Main Outcome Measures: Absolute and relative intertester reliability were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change. Paired t -tests were used to identify systematic measurement error between testers and to test for a difference in recorded knee flexor strength between methods of dynamometer fixation. Methods: Isometric knee flexor strength was measured in prone 0/15 degrees (hip/knee flexion) and supine 90/90 degrees position. Results: Good intertester reliability was found for all pairwise comparisons (ICC 0.80-0.87). MDCs (as percentage of mean strength) ranged from 15.2% to 25.4%. For tester couples where systematic error was identified, Bland–Altman plots and Pearson correlationAbstract : Objective: To assess intertester reliability of isometric knee flexor strength testing in high-level rugby players with testers of different physical capacity and different methods of dynamometer fixation. Design: Reliability study. Patients: Thirty noninjured high-level (Tegner Activity Score ≥9) rugby players, free from hamstring injury in the previous 2 months. Assessment: Isometric knee flexor strength (in N) in prone 0/15 degrees (hip/knee flexion) and supine 90/90 degrees position. Tests were performed by 1 female and 2 male testers whose upper-body strength was measured with a 6-repetition maximum bench press test. The prone 0/15 degrees measurement was performed with manual and external belt fixation of the dynamometer. Main Outcome Measures: Absolute and relative intertester reliability were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change. Paired t -tests were used to identify systematic measurement error between testers and to test for a difference in recorded knee flexor strength between methods of dynamometer fixation. Methods: Isometric knee flexor strength was measured in prone 0/15 degrees (hip/knee flexion) and supine 90/90 degrees position. Results: Good intertester reliability was found for all pairwise comparisons (ICC 0.80-0.87). MDCs (as percentage of mean strength) ranged from 15.2% to 25.4%. For tester couples where systematic error was identified, Bland–Altman plots and Pearson correlation coefficients demonstrated no statistically significant correlation between mean knee flexor strength and between-tester difference. There was no significant difference in isometric knee flexor strength between manual and belt fixation of the dynamometer. Conclusions: In strong high-level rugby players, hand-held dynamometry for isometric knee flexor strength assessment in prone 0/15 degrees and supine 90/90 degrees position is intertester reliable. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical journal of sport medicine. Volume 31:Issue 5(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical journal of sport medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Issue 5(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 5 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0031-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09
- Subjects:
- isometric -- hamstring strength -- HHD -- peak force -- reliability
Sports medicine -- Periodicals
617.1027 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.cjsportmed.com/ ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00042752-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/cjsportsmed/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000793 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1050-642X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.294300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24936.xml