Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Mid/Hindfoot Trauma: Comparison of Limb Salvage and Transtibial Amputation (OUTLET). (1st September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Mid/Hindfoot Trauma: Comparison of Limb Salvage and Transtibial Amputation (OUTLET). (1st September 2021)
- Main Title:
- Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Mid/Hindfoot Trauma
- Authors:
- Bosse, Michael J.
Carroll, Eben A.
Firoozabadi, Reza
Gary, Joshua L.
Gordon, Wade T.
Jones, Clifford B.
Morshed, Saam
Teague, David
Scharfstein, Daniel O.
Luly, Jason
MacKenzie, Ellen J.
Reider, Lisa
Andrews McArthur, Erica
Hsu, Joseph R.
Karunakar, Madhav A.
Sample Robinson, Katherine
Seymour, Rachel B.
Sims, Stephen H.
Churchill, Christine
Fox, Wade E.
Mayfield, Ada P.
Hayda, Roman
Born, Christopher T.
Crisco, Mary Jean
Mauffrey, Cyril
Hak, David J.
Henderson Trujillo, Corey
Nadeau, Jason T.
Reilly, Rachel M.
Howes, Cameron R.
Moore, Thomas
Schenker, Mara L.
Taylor, Benjamin C.
Schmidt, Andrew H.
Westberg, Jerald
Mullis, Brian H.
Ertl, Janos P.
Shively, Karl D.
Moore, Molly M.
McKinley, Todd O.
Sorkin, Anthony T.
Virkus, Walter W.
Vallier, Heather A.
Breslin, Mary A.
Kuhn, Kevin M.
Sheu, Robert G.
Toledano, James E.
Zalewski, Brian A.
Konda, Sanjit R.
Langford, Joshua R.
Harriott, Paula J.
Sietsema, Debra L.
Reid, J. Spence
Horne, Andrea
Osborn, Patrick M.
Rivera, Jessica C.
Stinner, Daniel J.
Wilken, Jason M.
Cannada, Lisa K.
Dawson, Sarah A.
Shah, Anjan R.
Infante, Anthony F.
Maxson, Benjamin
Mir, Hassan
Sagi, H. Claude
Watson, David
Steverson, Barbara
Miclau, Theodore
O'Toole, Robert V.
Boulton, Christina L.
LeBrun, Christopher T.
Manson, Theodore
Nascone, Jason W.
Pollak, Andrew N.
Sciadini, Marcus F.
Slobogean, Gerard P.
Degani, Yasmin
Howe, Andrea L.
Rudnicki, Joshua
Zych, Gregory A.
Quinnan, Stephen M
Zych, Gabriela M.
Schroder, Lisa K.
Vang, Sandy X.
Bergin, Patrick F.
Graves, Matt L.
Russell, George V.
Spitler, Clay A.
Hydrick, Josie M.
Ertl, William
Moloney, Gele B.
Evans, Andrew R.
Tarkin, Ivan S.
Achor, Timothy S.
Choo, Andrew M.
McGarvey, William C.
Melton, Danielle H.
Munz, John W.
Rao, Mayank
Lee (Chip) Routt, Milton
Boutte, Sterling J.
Weiss, David B.
Yarboro, Seth R.
Lester-Ballard, Veronica
McVey, Eric D.
Sangeorzan, Bruce
Agel, Julie
Obremskey, William T.
Archer, Kristin R.
Boyce, Robert H.
Burgos, Eduardo J.
Gajari, Vamshi
Jahangir, A. Alex
Molina, Cesar S.
Rodriguez-Buitrago, Andres
Tummuru, Rajesh R.
Trochez, Karen M.
Halvorson, Jason J.
Miller, Anna N.
Pilson, Holly
Goodman, James Brett
Holden, Martha B.
Potter, Benjamin K.
D'Alleyrand, Jean-Claude G.
Lucio, Whitley B.
McAndrew, Christopher M.
Gardner, Michael J.
Ricci, William M.
Spraggs-Hughes, Amanda
Castillo, Renan C.
Allen, Lauren E.
Carlini, Anthony R.
Alkhoury, Dana
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Selecting the best treatment for patients with severe terminal lower-limb injury remains a challenge. For some injuries, amputation may result in better outcomes than limb salvage. This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent limb salvage with those that would have been achieved had they undergone amputation. Methods: This multicenter prospective observational study included patients 18 to 60 years of age in whom a Type-III pilon or IIIB or C ankle fracture, a Type-III talar or calcaneal fracture, or an open or closed blast/crush foot injury had been treated with limb salvage (n = 488) or amputation (n = 151) and followed for 18 months. The primary outcome was the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Causal effect estimates of the improvement that amputation would have provided if it had been performed instead of limb salvage were calculated for the SMFA score, physical performance, pain, participation in vigorous activities, and return to work. Results: The patients who underwent limb salvage would have had small differences in most outcomes had they undergone amputation. The most notable difference was an improvement in the SMFA mobility score of 7 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0 to 10.7). Improvements were largest for pilon/ankle fractures and complex injury patterns. Conclusions: Amputation should be considered a treatment option rather than a last resort for the most complex terminal lower-limb injuries. LevelAbstract : Background: Selecting the best treatment for patients with severe terminal lower-limb injury remains a challenge. For some injuries, amputation may result in better outcomes than limb salvage. This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent limb salvage with those that would have been achieved had they undergone amputation. Methods: This multicenter prospective observational study included patients 18 to 60 years of age in whom a Type-III pilon or IIIB or C ankle fracture, a Type-III talar or calcaneal fracture, or an open or closed blast/crush foot injury had been treated with limb salvage (n = 488) or amputation (n = 151) and followed for 18 months. The primary outcome was the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Causal effect estimates of the improvement that amputation would have provided if it had been performed instead of limb salvage were calculated for the SMFA score, physical performance, pain, participation in vigorous activities, and return to work. Results: The patients who underwent limb salvage would have had small differences in most outcomes had they undergone amputation. The most notable difference was an improvement in the SMFA mobility score of 7 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0 to 10.7). Improvements were largest for pilon/ankle fractures and complex injury patterns. Conclusions: Amputation should be considered a treatment option rather than a last resort for the most complex terminal lower-limb injuries. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of bone and joint surgery. Volume 103:Number 17(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of bone and joint surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 103:Number 17(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 103, Issue 17 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 103
- Issue:
- 17
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0103-0017-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-01
- Subjects:
- Bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Joints -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Orthopedics -- Periodicals
Orthopedics
General Surgery
Bone Diseases
Joint Diseases
Bones -- Surgery
Joints -- Surgery
Orthopedics
Bot (anatomie)
Gewrichten
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Periodicals
Electronic journals
Periodicals
617.47005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00219355 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/00219355 ↗
http://www.ejbjs.org/contents-by-date.0.dtl ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&MODE=ovid&NEWS=N&AN=00002060-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.2106/JBJS.20.01320 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0021-9355
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.250000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24950.xml