Metal Versus Plastic Stents for Pancreatic Fluid Collection Drainage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Issue 8 (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhou, Xianzhu; Lin, Han; Su, Xiaoju; Zhang, Pingping; Fu, Chunting; Kong, Xiangyu; Jin, Zhendong; Li, Zhaoshen; Du, Yiqi; Zhu, Huiyun
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical gastroenterology. Volume 55:Issue 8(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: pancreatic pseudocysts -- walled-off-necrosis -- endoscopic ultrasound; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases; Gastroenterology; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001539
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0192-0790

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The therapeutic efficacy of metal stents (MSs) for pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) is invariably controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the results of efficacy of MSs and plastic stents (PSs) in PFC drainage. Subjects and Methods: We performed a literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE for all of the published studies regarding the use of MSs and PSs for endoscopic transmural drainage of PFCs from January, 1 2015 to June 1, 2020. We extracted data from 9 studies (1359 patients) that met the inclusion criteria. The main outcome measures were the rates of treatment success, including technique success and clinical success (CS), adverse events, recurrence, procedure time, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: There was no difference in overall technique success between patients treated with MSs and PSs for PFCs. However, MSs showed a higher CS rate 92% versus 82% ( P <0.01) and a lower overall adverse event rate 20% versus 31% ( P <0.01) than PSs. The recurrence rate of PFCs using MSs also had significant advantages over PSs 3% versus 10% ( P <0.01) and MSs needed a shorter procedure time than PSs (26.73 vs. 45.40 min, P <0.01). In comparing direct endoscopic necrosectomy use and LOS, there was no difference between MSs and PSs. Conclusions: Bringing together the results of the current study, endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of PFCs using MSs may be superior to PSs in terms of CS, adverse events rates and recurrence rate, with similar LOS and direct endoscopic necrosectomy use. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.