Supply and Demand of Domestic Corneal Tissue and Its Implications on Export Potential—Using Australia as an Example. Issue 10 (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Machin, Heather; Buckland, Lisa; Georges, Pierre; Ghabcha, Mona; Golding-Holbrook, Tamme; Leighton, Candice; Mackey, Adrienne; Weinel, Luke; Whiting, Victoria; Sutton, Gerard; Baird, Paul N.
• Is Part Of: Cornea. Volume 40:Issue 10(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: corneal tissue -- Australia -- exportation -- donation -- surplus; Cornea -- Periodicals; Cornea -- Periodicals; Cornée -- Périodiques; 617.719
• DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002599
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-3740

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Corneal tissue importation is only possible if another country is able to export corneas without impacting its own domestic demand. Currently, there is little evidence to indicate whether export nations have such surplus capacity and in a position to export. To explore this concept, we examined our nation, Australia, which is reported to routinely decline donations because of its ability to meet domestic corneal transplant demand. Our research offers insights and opportunities for Australia and other nations to evaluate their domestic and international supply and allocation of corneal tissue in this space. Method: We collated 12 months of data on collected and noncollected donations, through participating Australian Eye Banks. The explanation of why some known donors were declined or not pursued indicated if demand was met and potential surplus-for-export levels. Results: There were 7.5% (n = 11, 889) of deaths in Australia that were notified to Australian Eye Banks during our reporting period. Of those, 9.3% (n = 1106/11, 889) were recovered and allocated, 15.7% (n = 1863/11, 889) were known but declined, and 75% (n = 8920/11, 889) were not pursued. Of those that were declined, 64.3% (n = 1197/1863) were declined because of limitations with service/manpower at the eye bank, whereas 35.7% (n = 666/1863) were declined because demand was met. Conclusions: Australia did not meet demand all the time, during our data period. There were adequate quantities of potential donors to support increasing recovery for domestic allocation and provide for exportation without hindrance to Australian demand. Further examination of domestic supply and demand cycles and the export process is required before routine exportation. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.