Is the intima-media thickness of temporal and axillary arteries influenced by cardiovascular risk?. (6th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martire, María Victoria; Cipolletta, Edoardo; Di Matteo, Andrea; Di Carlo, Marco; Jesus, Diogo; Grassi, Walter; Filippucci, Emilio
• Is Part Of: Rheumatology. Volume 60:Number 11(2021)
• Page Start: 5362
• Page End: 5368
• Publication Date: 2021-02-06
• Subjects: ultrasound -- temporal arteries -- giant cell arteritis -- cardiovascular risk; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; Rheumatology -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab117
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-0324

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To measure with US the intima-media thickness (IMT) of temporal (superficial, parietal and frontal branches) and axillary arteries in subjects without a diagnosis of GCA and/or PMR with different cardiovascular (CV) risk; and to assess the performance of previously proposed cut-off values for normal IMT. Methods: Subjects ≥ 50 years without a diagnosis of GCA or PMR were included. Bilateral US of the temporal arteries, including the frontal and parietal branches, and axillary arteries was performed by two sonographers using a 10–22 MHz and 6–18 MHz probe. The following previously proposed cut-offs were considered: superficial temporal artery: 0.42 mm; frontal branch: 0.34 mm; parietal branch: 0.29 mm; axillary artery: 1.0 mm. Results: A total of 808 arteries in 101 subjects were evaluated; of these, 31 (30.7%) were classified as very high CV risk, seven (6.9%) as high, 34 (33.7%) as moderate and 29 (28.7%) as low risk. Subjects with very high or high risk showed higher IMT than those with moderate or low risk in the superficial temporal arteries [0.23 (s .d . 0.07) vs 0.20 (s .d . 0.04), P < 0.01] and in the axillary arteries [0.54 (s .d . 0.17) vs 0.48 (s .d . 0.10), P = 0.002] . The IMT was higher than the reference cut-off in 13/808 (1.6%) arteries, in ≥1 artery in 10/101 subjects (10.1%). Of these 10 subjects, 8 (80%) were classified as having very high or high risk. Conclusion: Our results suggest that CV risk might influence the US-determined IMT of the temporal and axillary arteries in subjects without GCA. Therefore, in patients with suspected GCA, particular attention should be paid when measuring the IMT in those patients with very high/high CV risk.