Arrhythmias Other Than Atrial Fibrillation in Those With an Irregular Pulse Detected With a Smartwatch: Findings From the Apple Heart Study. (October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Arrhythmias Other Than Atrial Fibrillation in Those With an Irregular Pulse Detected With a Smartwatch: Findings From the Apple Heart Study. (October 2021)
- Main Title:
- Arrhythmias Other Than Atrial Fibrillation in Those With an Irregular Pulse Detected With a Smartwatch
- Authors:
- Perino, Alexander C.
Gummidipundi, Santosh E.
Lee, Justin
Hedlin, Haley
Garcia, Ariadna
Ferris, Todd
Balasubramanian, Vidhya
Gardner, Rebecca M.
Cheung, Lauren
Hung, Grace
Granger, Christopher B.
Kowey, Peter
Rumsfeld, John S.
Russo, Andrea M.
True Hills, Mellanie
Talati, Nisha
Nag, Divya
Tsay, David
Desai, Sumbul
Desai, Manisha
Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
Turakhia, Mintu P.
Perez, Marco V. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: The Apple watch irregular pulse detection algorithm was found to have a positive predictive value of 0.84 for identification of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to describe the prevalence of arrhythmias other than AF in those with an irregular pulse detected on a smartwatch. Methods: The Apple Heart Study investigated a smartwatch-based irregular pulse notification algorithm to identify AF. For this secondary analysis, we analyzed participants who received an ambulatory ECG patch after index irregular pulse notification. We excluded participants with AF identified on ECG patch and described the prevalence of other arrhythmias on the remaining participant ECG patches. We also reported the proportion of participants self-reporting subsequent AF diagnosis. Results: Among 419 297 participants enrolled in the Apple Heart Study, 450 participant ECG patches were analyzed, with no AF on 297 ECG patches (66%). Non-AF arrhythmias (excluding supraventricular tachycardias <30 beats and pauses <3 seconds) were detected in 119 participants (40.1%) with ECG patches without AF. The most common arrhythmias were frequent PACs (burden ≥1% to <5%, 15.8%; ≥5% to <15%, 8.8%), atrial tachycardia (≥30 beats, 5.4%), frequent PVCs (burden ≥1% to <5%, 6.1%; ≥5% to <15%, 2.7%), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (4–7 beats, 6.4%; ≥8 beats, 3.7%). Of 249 participants with no AF detected on ECG patch and patient-reported data available, 76 participants (30.5%) reportedAbstract : Background: The Apple watch irregular pulse detection algorithm was found to have a positive predictive value of 0.84 for identification of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to describe the prevalence of arrhythmias other than AF in those with an irregular pulse detected on a smartwatch. Methods: The Apple Heart Study investigated a smartwatch-based irregular pulse notification algorithm to identify AF. For this secondary analysis, we analyzed participants who received an ambulatory ECG patch after index irregular pulse notification. We excluded participants with AF identified on ECG patch and described the prevalence of other arrhythmias on the remaining participant ECG patches. We also reported the proportion of participants self-reporting subsequent AF diagnosis. Results: Among 419 297 participants enrolled in the Apple Heart Study, 450 participant ECG patches were analyzed, with no AF on 297 ECG patches (66%). Non-AF arrhythmias (excluding supraventricular tachycardias <30 beats and pauses <3 seconds) were detected in 119 participants (40.1%) with ECG patches without AF. The most common arrhythmias were frequent PACs (burden ≥1% to <5%, 15.8%; ≥5% to <15%, 8.8%), atrial tachycardia (≥30 beats, 5.4%), frequent PVCs (burden ≥1% to <5%, 6.1%; ≥5% to <15%, 2.7%), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (4–7 beats, 6.4%; ≥8 beats, 3.7%). Of 249 participants with no AF detected on ECG patch and patient-reported data available, 76 participants (30.5%) reported subsequent AF diagnosis. Conclusions: In participants with an irregular pulse notification on the Apple Watch and no AF observed on ECG patch, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, mostly PACs and PVCs, were detected in 40% of participants. Defining optimal care for patients with detection of incidental arrhythmias other than AF is important as AF detection is further investigated, implemented, and refined. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Circulation. Volume 14:Number 10(2021)
- Journal:
- Circulation
- Issue:
- Volume 14:Number 10(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 14, Issue 10 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0014-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10
- Subjects:
- algorithms -- atrial fibrillation -- humans -- pragmatic clinical trials as topic -- prevalence
Arrhythmia -- Periodicals
Heart -- Electric properties -- Periodicals
616.128 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=01337493-000000000-00000 ↗
http://circep.ahajournals.org/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010063 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1941-3149
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3265.262500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24933.xml