Early Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis. Issue 4 (28th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sastry, Rahul A; Pertsch, Nathan J; Sagaityte, Emilija; Poggi, Jonathan A; Toms, Steven A; Weil, Robert J
• Is Part Of: Neurosurgery. Volume 89:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 653
• Page End: 663
• Publication Date: 2021-07-28
• Subjects: Revascularization -- Stroke -- Readmission -- Mortality -- Morbidity -- Myocardial infarction -- Length of stay -- Readmission -- Reoperation -- Discharge destination; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.48005
• DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab250
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-396X

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) represent options to treat many patients with carotid stenosis. Although randomized trial data are plentiful, estimated rates of morbidity and mortality for both CEA and CAS have varied substantially. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of adverse outcomes after CAS and CEA in a large national database. METHODS: We analyzed 84 191 adult patients undergoing elective, nonemergent CAS (n = 81 361) or CEA (n = 2830), from 2011 to 2018, in the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Odds of adverse outcomes (30-d rates of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrest, prolonged length of stay (LOS), readmission, reoperation, and mortality) were evaluated in propensity-matched (n = 2821) cohorts through logistic regression. RESULTS: In the propensity-matched cohorts, CAS had increased odds of periprocedural stroke (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% CI 1.32-2.95) and decreased odds of cardiac arrest (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.84) and 30-d reoperation (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.44-0.80) compared to CEA. Relative odds of MI, prolonged LOS, discharge to destination other than home, 30-d readmission, or 30-d mortality were statistically similar. In the unmatched patient population, rates of adverse outcomes with CEA were constant over time; however, for CAS, rates of stroke increased over time. In both the matched and unmatched patient cohorts, patients 70 yr and older had lower rates of post-procedural stroke with CEA, but not with CAS, compared to younger patients. CONCLUSION: In a propensity-matched analysis of a large, prospectively collected, national, surgical database, CAS was associated with increased odds of periprocedural stroke, which increased over time. Rates of MI and death were not significantly different between the 2 procedures.