O018/#482 Updated safety of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: study 309/keynote-775. (4th December 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- O018/#482 Updated safety of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: study 309/keynote-775. (4th December 2022)
- Main Title:
- O018/#482 Updated safety of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: study 309/keynote-775
- Authors:
- Makker, Vicky
Colombo, Nicoletta
Herráez, Antonio Casado
Monk, Bradley
Mackay, Helen
Santin, Alessandro
Miller, David
Moore, Richard
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Shapira-Frommer, Ronnie
Ushijima, Kimio
Yonemori, Kan
Kim, Yong Man
Alia, Eva Guerra
Sanli, Ulus
Xie, Ran
Zale, Melissa
Mckenzie, Jodi
Barresi, Gianmaria
Lorusso, Domenica - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: In patients with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC), lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (L+P) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS, OS, and ORR versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) at first efficacy interim analysis. Efficacy was maintained with extended follow-up at the final prespecified data cutoff (1 March 2022). Here we report additional safety/tolerability analyses from the same final prespecified data cutoff. Methods: Detailed methods have been published [Makker 2022]. Briefly, patients with aEC and 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen (up to 2 if 1 given in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were randomized (1:1) to receive lenvatinib 20 mg orally QD + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W or TPC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m 2 IV Q3W or paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 IV QW [3-weeks-on/1-week-off]). We report safety data of patients who received treatment with 16 months of additional follow-up since the primary analysis. Results: 794 Patients treated with L+P (n=406) or TPC (n=388) were included. Data for these patients regarding adverse events are shown in the table 1 . Dose interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were experienced by 71.9% of patients treated with L+P (lenvatinib: 61.6%; pembrolizumab: 52.5%; L+P: 32.5%) and by 28.4% of patients treated with TPC. Dose reductions were needed for 67.2% of patients who received lenvatinib and 12.6% of patients who received TPC. Treatment was discontinued byAbstract : Objectives: In patients with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC), lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (L+P) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS, OS, and ORR versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) at first efficacy interim analysis. Efficacy was maintained with extended follow-up at the final prespecified data cutoff (1 March 2022). Here we report additional safety/tolerability analyses from the same final prespecified data cutoff. Methods: Detailed methods have been published [Makker 2022]. Briefly, patients with aEC and 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen (up to 2 if 1 given in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were randomized (1:1) to receive lenvatinib 20 mg orally QD + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3W or TPC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m 2 IV Q3W or paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 IV QW [3-weeks-on/1-week-off]). We report safety data of patients who received treatment with 16 months of additional follow-up since the primary analysis. Results: 794 Patients treated with L+P (n=406) or TPC (n=388) were included. Data for these patients regarding adverse events are shown in the table 1 . Dose interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were experienced by 71.9% of patients treated with L+P (lenvatinib: 61.6%; pembrolizumab: 52.5%; L+P: 32.5%) and by 28.4% of patients treated with TPC. Dose reductions were needed for 67.2% of patients who received lenvatinib and 12.6% of patients who received TPC. Treatment was discontinued by 39.2% of patients who received L+P (lenvatinib: 35.7%; pembrolizumab: 22.2%; L+P: 16.0%) and by 8.0% of patients who received TPC. Conclusions: In patients with aEC, updated safety/tolerability results with L+P over extended time were generally consistent with the primary analysis from Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 32(2022)Supplement 3
- Journal:
- International journal of gynecological cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 32(2022)Supplement 3
- Issue Display:
- Volume 32, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 32
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0032-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- A11
- Page End:
- A11
- Publication Date:
- 2022-12-04
- Subjects:
- Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99465 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ijgc/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118544021/toc ↗
https://ijgc.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/ijgc-2022-igcs.20 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1048-891X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24966.xml