RADT-16. CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOR HIGH RISK WHO GRADE II GLIOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH UPFRONT TMZ-BASED CHEMORADIOTHERAPY. (14th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zarabi, Hosniya; Wicks, Robert; Russel, Gregory; Banderage, Dineth; Strowd, Roy; Mott, Ryan; Laxton, Adrian; Tatter, Stephen; White, Jaclyn; Lo, Hui-Wen; Debinski, Waldemar; Chan, Michael; Lesser, Glenn; Cramer, Christina
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 24(2022)Supplement 7
• Page Start: vii52
• Page End: vii52
• Publication Date: 2022-11-14
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac209.206
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: RTOG 9802 demonstrated improved survival using chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over radiotherapy (RT) alone for WHO Grade II gliomas (LGG) using PCV with RT. We analyze our retrospective dataset of predominantly temozolomide (TMZ)-based CRT in LGG patients who would have been eligible for RTOG 9802. METHODS: Retrospective review of LGG patients (2000–2017) treated at a single institution (67 patients). Histologies included oligodendroglioma(OD), astrocytoma(AC) or astrocytoma (OA). Those who received upfront RT +/- chemotherapy were included. The CRT cohort (n=40) consisted primarily of TMZ (n=36) administered concurrently with RT. 27 patients received RT alone. RT for both cohorts consisted of a median dose of 54 Gy (range 50.4 - 54 Gy). 65/67 patients had "high risk" LGG as defined by RTOG 9802 criteria. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to assess overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 5-year PFS for patients receiving CRT was 64% vs. 44% in those receiving RT alone (log rank p=0.009). Difference in PFS due to chemotherapy was driven by AC histology (57% vs. 21% PFS at 5 years, log rank p=0.002) while OD/OA PFS was not statistically altered (79% vs. 72% PFS at 5 years, p=0.21). 5-year OS for patients receiving CRT was 76% vs. 69% in those receiving RT alone (p=0.11). Cox Proportional Hazards analysis showed that use of upfront CRT (HR=0.4, p=0.009) was the only factor that decreased the risk of earlier progression. CONCLUSION: Use of upfront, predominantly TMZ-based CRT, has a PFS benefit over RT alone in a population of WHO grade II gliomas. This benefit appears to be driven by AC histology and also appears to extend beyond the "very high risk" cohort from RTOG 0424 to include the "high risk" group from RTOG 9802.