Development of a coordinated registry network for pelvic organ prolapse technologies. (14th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baird, Courtney E; Chughtai, Bilal; Bradley, Catherine S; Kobashi, Kathleen; Jung, Mary; Sedrakyan, Art; Andrews, Sharon; Ferriter, Ann; Cornelison, Terri; Marinac-Dabic, Danica
• Is Part Of: BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies. Volume 4(2022)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2022-11-14
• Subjects: Delphi -- device evaluation -- urology devices -- women's health -- real world evidence; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Research -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000076
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2631-4940

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: The accumulation of data through a prospective, multicenter Coordinated Registry Network (CRN) could be a robust and cost-effective way to gather real-world evidence on the performance of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) technologies for device-based and intervention-based studies. To develop the CRN, a group of POP experts consisting of representatives from professional societies, the Food and Drug Administration, academia, industry, and the patient community, was convened to discuss the role and feasibility of the CRN and to identify the core data elements important to assess POP technologies. Design: A Delphi method approach was employed to achieve consensus on a core minimum dataset for the CRN. A series of surveys were sent to the panel and answered by each expert anonymously and individually. Results from the surveys were collected, collated, and analyzed by the study design team from Weill Cornell Medicine. Questions for the next round were based on the analysis process and discussed with group members via conference call. This process was repeated twice over a 6-month time period during which consensus was achieved. Results: Twenty-one experts participated in the effort and proposed 120 data elements. Participation rates in the first and second round of the Delphi survey were 95.2% and 71.4%, respectively. The working group reached final consensus among responders on 90 data elements capturing relevant general medical and surgical history, procedure and discharge, short-term and long-term follow-up, device factors, and surgery and surgeon factors. Conclusions: The CRN successfully developed a set of core data elements to support the study of POP technologies through convening an expert panel on POP technologies and using the Delphi method. These standardized data elements have the potential to influence patient and provider decisions about treatments and include important outcomes related to efficacy and safety.