Reconstructive Approaches Following Sphenoorbital Meningioma Resection. Issue 1 (1st January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rochlin, Danielle H.; Mittermiller, Paul A.; DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn; Weiss, Hannah; Dastagirzada, Yosef; Patel, Vishal; Hagiwara, Mari; Flores, Roberto; Sen, Chandra; Staffenberg, David A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of craniofacial surgery. Volume 34:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: e10
• Page End: e15
• Publication Date: 2023-01-01
• Subjects: calvarial reconstruction -- orbital reconstruction -- orbitozygomatic osteotomy -- sphenoorbital meningioma; Facial bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Skull -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.52
• DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008835
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-2275

Abstract

Abstract : Sphenoorbital meningiomas are a challenge to access and reconstruct. Although there is much neurosurgical literature on resection of such tumors, there is little discussion on the best methods for the reconstruction of consequent defects, which are often extensive due to large areas of hyperostosis requiring resection. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent resection and reconstruction of a sphenoorbital meningioma by the senior authors (C.S. and D.A.S.) between 2010 and 2020. Surgical access in all cases included an orbitozygomatic osteotomy. The study cohort consisted of 23 patients (20 female, 3 male) with an average age of 50 (range: 37–72) years at the time of surgery. Most patients had progressive proptosis before the ablative operation. Orbital reconstruction was with a combined titanium-Medpor implant in 18 patients, split calvarial bone graft in 3 patients, and a Medpor implant in 2 patients. Calvarial reconstruction was performed with titanium mesh in 21 patients, split calvarial bone graft and titanium mesh in 1 patient, and craniotomy bone and titanium plate in 1 patient. Reoperation was required in 7 patients due to hypoglobus or enophthalmos (N=2), orbital implant malposition (N=1), abscess (N=1), pain (N=1), intracranial fat graft modification (N=1), and soft tissue deformities (N=2). Our experience demonstrates that sphenoorbital meningiomas can require broad areas of resection of the skull base and calvarium and necessitate comprehensive reconstruction of the anterior cranial fossa, orbital walls, and cranium. Collaboration between craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons can achieve optimal results.