Reliability and agreement of apparent chord mu measurements between static and dynamic evaluations. Issue 1 (January 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reliability and agreement of apparent chord mu measurements between static and dynamic evaluations. Issue 1 (January 2023)
- Main Title:
- Reliability and agreement of apparent chord mu measurements between static and dynamic evaluations
- Authors:
- Martínez-Plaza, Elena
Marcos, Mario
López-de la Rosa, Alberto
López-Miguel, Alberto
Maldonado, Miguel J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario provide repeatable measurements of apparent chord mu length and Cartesian coordinates; however, measurements are not interchangeable except for Y-coordinate values under photopic conditions. Abstract : Purpose: To assess the repeatability and agreement of Cartesian coordinates and the length of apparent chord mu and pupil diameter measurements during static (Galilei G4) and dynamic (Topolyzer Vario) evaluations. Setting: IOBA-Eye Institute, Valladolid, Spain. Design: Case series. Methods: 3 consecutive measurements per scenario (Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic and photopic conditions) were performed by the same clinician. The intrasession repeatability was assessed using the within-subject SD (Sw), the precision, the coefficient of variation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Bland-Altman method. Results: Thirty-seven healthy participants were recruited. The Sw values for chord mu parameters and pupil diameter ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 and 0.08 to 0.21, respectively. The ICC was ≥0.89 for all parameters. Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic and photopic conditions provided significantly different measures of apparent chord mu length (0.23 ± 0.11 mm, 0.30 ± 0.10 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, P ≤ .02), X-coordinate (−0.18 ± 0.12 mm, −0.27 ± 0.11 mm, and −0.21 ± 0.12 mm, respectively, P < .001), and pupilAbstract : Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario provide repeatable measurements of apparent chord mu length and Cartesian coordinates; however, measurements are not interchangeable except for Y-coordinate values under photopic conditions. Abstract : Purpose: To assess the repeatability and agreement of Cartesian coordinates and the length of apparent chord mu and pupil diameter measurements during static (Galilei G4) and dynamic (Topolyzer Vario) evaluations. Setting: IOBA-Eye Institute, Valladolid, Spain. Design: Case series. Methods: 3 consecutive measurements per scenario (Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic and photopic conditions) were performed by the same clinician. The intrasession repeatability was assessed using the within-subject SD (Sw), the precision, the coefficient of variation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Bland-Altman method. Results: Thirty-seven healthy participants were recruited. The Sw values for chord mu parameters and pupil diameter ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 and 0.08 to 0.21, respectively. The ICC was ≥0.89 for all parameters. Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic and photopic conditions provided significantly different measures of apparent chord mu length (0.23 ± 0.11 mm, 0.30 ± 0.10 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, P ≤ .02), X-coordinate (−0.18 ± 0.12 mm, −0.27 ± 0.11 mm, and −0.21 ± 0.12 mm, respectively, P < .001), and pupil diameter (3.38 ± 0.50 mm, 6.29 ± 0.60 mm, and 3.04 ± 0.41 mm, respectively, P < .001). Y-coordinate values obtained by Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under low mesopic conditions were significantly different (0.06 ± 0.13 mm vs 0.03 ± 0.11 mm, respectively, P = .02), in contrast to Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario under photopic conditions (0.05 ± 0.13 mm, P = .82) and both illumination conditions of Topolyzer Vario ( P ≥ .23). Conclusions: Galilei G4 and Topolyzer Vario provide consistent measurements of apparent chord mu Cartesian coordinates and length, as well as pupil diameter; however, the measurements are not interchangeable. Ophthalmic surgeons should consider these findings when planning customized intraocular lens implantation and refractive surgery procedures. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. Volume 49:Issue 1(2023)
- Journal:
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 49:Issue 1(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 49, Issue 1 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 49
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0049-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 21
- Page End:
- 28
- Publication Date:
- 2023-01
- Subjects:
- 617.7
- Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001036 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0886-3350
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 24865.xml