Brain region‐specific metabolic signatures of Alzheimer's disease. (20th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Batra, Richa; Krumsiek, Jan; Wang, Xue; Allen, Mariet; Wörheide, Maria A.; Blach, Colette; Bennett, David A; Kastenmüller, Gabi; Arnold, Matthias; Ertekin‐Taner, Nilufer; Kaddurah‐Daouk, Rima
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 18(2022)Supplement 3
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-12-20
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.067879
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Metabolic dysregulation is one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Alterations in metabolism have been associated with AD‐related comorbidities, cognitive decline, and AD brain pathology. Brain regions are differentially affected with AD neuropathology and exhibit metabolic heterogeneity. Therefore, to build a more comprehensive picture of metabolic impact of AD, region‐specific AD‐associated metabolic changes need to be determined. Method: We profiled 344 brain samples from the Mayo Clinic brain bank using Metabolon's untargeted metabolomics platform, covering 182 samples from the cerebellum (CER) and 162 samples from the temporal cortex (TCX). Generalized linear models were used to assess the association of metabolic profiles with AD. Models included confounder correction for age at death, sex, and number of APOE ‐ε4 alleles. To extend this study to four more brain regions, we included results from previously published brain metabolomics studies based on samples from three independent cohorts, including dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) from ROS/MAP, parietal lobe (PTL) from Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM), inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) and middle frontal gyrus (MFG) from Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). Result: In the Mayo cohort, a total of 190 out of the 658 metabolites were significantly associated with AD. Out of the 190, 127 metabolites associated only in the CER region, 37 metabolites associated only in the TCX region, and 26 metabolites were associated in both brain regions. There were no metabolites commonly regulated in all the 6 brain regions under investigation. DLPFC and CER had the highest overlap of 70 metabolites, followed by DLPFC and PTL with 64 metabolites, and CER and PTL with 47 metabolites. For functional interpretation of our findings, each metabolite was further categorized with a sub‐pathway annotation provided by Metabolon. 3 of the 88 pathways including methionine cycle, phospholipid metabolism, and glutathione metabolism, were commonly regulated in the six brain regions under investigation. Conclusion: We present a first global perspective on AD‐associated metabolic alterations across six brain regions. This study will pave the way to fill the gap in our understanding of region‐specific metabolic deregulations associated with AD pathophysiology.