Complexity of Online Facial Feminization Surgery Material Exceeds Patient Health Literacy. Issue 8 (2nd November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cordero, Justin; Frediani, Tanner; Carre, Antoine Lyonel; Lee, James C.; Francis, Stacey H.; Chu, Michael W.
• Is Part Of: Journal of craniofacial surgery. Volume 33:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: e818
• Page End: e820
• Publication Date: 2022-11-02
• Subjects: Facial feminization surgery -- health literacy -- readability; Facial bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Skull -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.52
• DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008726
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-2275

Abstract

Abstract : The increase in healthcare coverage for transgender populations has made facial feminization surgeries (FFS) more accessible. Majority of patients interested in surgery regularly check online medical information to help understand surgical procedures, risks, and recovery. National health organizations recommend that patient information material should be written at a sixth-grade-reading level, but online material often surpasses patient health literacy. This study evaluates the readability of online FFS resources. An Internet search of the top 100 Web sites was conducted using the keywords "facial feminization surgery." Web sites were analyzed for relevant patient information articles on FFS and categorized into health care and nonhealth care groups. Readability examinations were performed for written text using the Automated Readability Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index. Statistical analysis was performed using 2-tailed z tests, with statistical significance set at P ≤0.05. A total of 100 articles from 100 Web sites were examined. The average readability for all online FFS resources was at a 12th-grade-writing level. Articles from health care organizations were at a 13th-grade-reading level and nonhealth care organization articles were at a 12th-grade-reading level ( P <0.01). Online patient information for FFS is more complex than nationally recommended writing levels, which may interfere with patient decision making and outcomes. Patient resources for FFS should be written at a lower reading level to promote patient education, satisfaction, and compliance.