DLPFC volume is a neural correlate of resilience in healthy high-risk individuals with both childhood maltreatment and familial risk for depression. Issue 16 (16th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brosch, Katharina; Stein, Frederike; Meller, Tina; Schmitt, Simon; Yuksel, Dilara; Ringwald, Kai Gustav; Pfarr, Julia-Katharina; Waltemate, Lena; Lemke, Hannah; Opel, Nils; Meinert, Susanne; Dohm, Katharina; Grotegerd, Dominik; Goltermann, Janik; Repple, Jonathan; Winter, Alexandra; Jansen, Andreas; Dannlowski, Udo; Nenadić, Igor; Kircher, Tilo; Krug, Axel
• Is Part Of: Psychological medicine. Volume 52:Issue 16(2022)
• Page Start: 4139
• Page End: 4145
• Publication Date: 2022-12-16
• Subjects: Childhood maltreatment -- DLPFC -- resilience -- risk factors -- voxel-based morphometry; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Medicine and psychology -- Periodicals; Clinical psychology -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721001094
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0033-2917

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Two prominent risk factors for major depressive disorder (MDD) are childhood maltreatment (CM) and familial risk for MDD. Despite having these risk factors, there are individuals who maintain mental health, i.e. are resilient, whereas others develop MDD. It is unclear which brain morphological alterations are associated with this kind of resilience. Interaction analyses of risk and diagnosis status are needed that can account for complex adaptation processes, to identify neural correlates of resilience. Methods: We analyzed brain structural data (3T magnetic resonance imaging) by means of voxel-based morphometry (CAT12 toolbox), using a 2 × 2 design, comparing four groups ( N = 804) that differed in diagnosis (healthy v. MDD) and risk profiles (low-risk, i.e. absence of CM and familial risk v. high-risk, i.e. presence of both CM and familial risk). Using regions of interest (ROIs) from the literature, we conducted an interaction analysis of risk and diagnosis status. Results: Volume in the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG), part of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), was significantly higher in healthy high-risk individuals. There were no significant results for the bilateral superior frontal gyri, frontal poles, pars orbitalis of the inferior frontal gyri, and the right MFG. Conclusions: The healthy high-risk group had significantly higher volumes in the left DLPFC compared to all other groups. The DLPFC is implicated in cognitive and emotional processes, and higher volume in this area might aid high-risk individuals in adaptive coping in order to maintain mental health. This increased volume might therefore constitute a neural correlate of resilience to MDD in high risk.