A highly feasible, reliable, and fully remote protocol for mobile app‐based cognitive assessment in cognitively healthy older adults. Issue 1 (5th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thompson, Louisa I.; Harrington, Karra D.; Roque, Nelson; Strenger, Jennifer; Correia, Stephen; Jones, Richard N.; Salloway, Stephen; Sliwinski, Martin J.
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 14:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-04-05
• Subjects: Cognitive testing -- digital tests -- early detection -- memory -- monitoring -- pre‐clinical Alzheimer's disease -- remote assessment -- screening -- smartphone app; Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer's disease -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; 616.831
• DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12283
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-8729

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The early detection of cognitive impairment is one of the most important challenges in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research. The use of brief, short‐term repeated test sessions via mobile app has demonstrated similar or better reliability and validity compared to standard in‐clinic assessments in adult samples. The present study examined adherence, acceptability, and reliability for a remote, app‐based cognitive screening protocol in healthy older adults. Methods: Cognitively unimpaired older adults ( N = 52, ages 60–80) completed three brief cognitive testing sessions per day within morning, afternoon, and evening time windows, for 8 consecutive days using a mobile app‐based cognitive testing platform. Cognitive tasks assessed visual working memory, processing speed, and episodic memory. Results: Participants completed an average of 93% (M = 22.3 sessions, standard deviation = 10.2) of the 24 assigned sessions within 8 to 9 days. Average daily adherence ranged from 95% of sessions completed on day 2 to 88% of sessions completed on day 8. There was a statistically significant effect of session time on adherence between the morning and afternoon sessions only F (1, 51) = 9.15, P = .004, η p 2 = 0.152, with fewer afternoon sessions completed on average. The within‐person reliabilities of average scores, aggregated across all 24 sessions, were exceptionally high, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97. Performance on the episodic memory task was positively and significantly associated with total score and word list recall score on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. In an exit survey, 65% of participants reported that they "definitely" would complete the sessions again. Discussion: These findings suggests that remote, mobile app–based cognitive testing in short bursts is both highly feasible and reliable in a motivated sample of cognitively normal older adults. Limitations include the limited diversity and generalizability of the sample; this was a largely White, highly educated, and motivated sample self‐selected for AD research.